首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Surface soil mixing is more beneficial than the plough layer mixing mode of biochar application for nitrogen retention in a paddy system
【24h】

Surface soil mixing is more beneficial than the plough layer mixing mode of biochar application for nitrogen retention in a paddy system

机译:表层土壤混合比生物炭施用的耕层混合模式更有利于稻田系统中的氮保持。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The benefits of biochar as a soil amendment have been investigated extensively, but few studies have considered the effects of different application modes on nitrogen (N) dynamics. In the present study, a pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of two different biochar application modes [plough layer mixing (PLM) and surface soil mixing (SSM)] on the N dynamics in a paddy system. It was found that biochar application significantly reduced the total N (TN), NH_4~+-N. and NO_3~--N contents of the paddy surface water after fertilization, and that the SSM mode of application was more effective in doing this, particularly for NH_4~+-N. reducing TN by 11-76%, NH_4~+-N by 31 -77%, and NO_3~--N by 31-60% compared with the control at 7 days after fertilizer dressing. By contrast, the effect of biochar application on soil N varied with biochar application mode, N form, and rice growth period. In general, there was no significant effect of biochar type on soil N content, with both types of biochar resulting in a higher TN content of the soil after the tiller stage compared with the control. In addition, the SSM mode of application led to a higher TN content but lower NH_4~+-N content of the soil than the PLM mode, while the two application modes had varying effects on the NO_3~- -N content depending on the growing period of the rice. The rice grain yield increased by 25-36% with the SSM application mode and 11-14% with the PLM mode. These findings indicate that the SSM mode of biochar application in paddy soils is a more promising strategy for both reducing the risk of N loss and improving rice yield than PLM mode.
机译:生物炭作为土壤改良剂的好处已得到广泛研究,但很少有研究考虑不同施用方式对氮(N)动力学的影响。在本研究中,进行了盆栽试验,以评估两种不同生物炭施用模式[耕层混合(PLM)和表土混合(SSM)]对稻田系统N动力学的影响。发现生物炭的施用显着降低了总氮(TN),NH_4〜+ -N。施肥后稻田表面水的NO_3〜--N含量较高,特别是对于NH_4〜+ -N,SSM施用方式更有效。施肥7天后,与对照组相比,TN降低了11-76%,NH_4〜+ -N降低了31 -77%,NO_3〜--N降低了31-60%。相比之下,生物炭施用对土壤氮素的影响随生物炭施用方式,氮素形态和水稻生长期的不同而不同。通常,生物炭类型对土壤氮含量没有显着影响,与对照相比,这两种类型的生物炭均导致分er期后土壤的总氮含量更高。此外,SSM模式的施用比PLM模式导致更高的TN含量,但土壤的NH_4〜+ -N含量更低,而两种施用模式对NO_3〜--N含量的影响取决于生长情况。大米的时期。在SSM模式下,水稻籽粒产量提高25-36%,在PLM模式下,水稻籽粒产量提高11-14%。这些发现表明,与PLM模式相比,在稻田土壤中应用生物炭SSM模式既可以降低氮素损失风险,又可以提高水稻产量,是一种更有希望的策略。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2020年第may20期|137399.1-137399.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain Ministry of Agriculture Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment fiangsu Academy of Agriculture Sciences No. 50.Zhongling Rd Nanjing 210014 PR China;

    School of the Environment and Safety Engineering Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212001 PR China;

    Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain Ministry of Agriculture Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment fiangsu Academy of Agriculture Sciences No. 50.Zhongling Rd Nanjing 210014 PR China;

    Institute of Agricultural Science in the Coastal Areajiangsu Kaifang Avenue No.59 Yancheng 224002 PR China;

    Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences Ministry of Ecological Environment Nanjing 210042 PR China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Nitrogen dynamic; Biochar application mode; Ammonium; Nitrate; Paddy system;

    机译:氮动态生物炭应用模式;铵;硝酸盐稻田系统;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号