...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >How we assess water safety: A critical review of sanitary inspection and water quality analysis
【24h】

How we assess water safety: A critical review of sanitary inspection and water quality analysis

机译:我们如何评估水安全:对卫生检查和水质分析的严格审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sanitary inspection is used in low-, medium- and high-income settings to assess the risk of microbial contamination at water sources. However, the relationship between sanitary inspection and water quality is not well understood. We conducted a critical literature review and synthesized the findings of 25 studies comparing the results of sanitary inspection and microbial water quality analysis. Most studies used sub-standard sanitary inspection and water quality analysis methods, and applied simplistic comparisons that do not characterize the complexity of the relationship. Sanitary risk score was used to represent sanitary inspection results in 21 (84%) studies; of which 12 (57%) found a significant association between score and microbial water quality and nine (43%) did not. Participatory sanitary inspection (12%) and reporting results back to communities (24%) were uncommon. Most studies relied on laboratory-based water quality analysis as an independently sufficient measure of safety, but reported inadequate quality control (52%) and/or sub-standard sample processing methods (66%). We found that sanitary inspections could contribute to improving water safety through four mechanisms: guiding remedial action at individual water sources, allowing operators and external support programs to prioritize repairs, identifying programmatic issues, and contributing to research. The purpose of the sanitary inspection should be considered when planning sanitary inspection execution, data analysis, and reporting to ensure appropriate methods are employed and results are fit for purpose. Further exploration should recognize that sanitary risk factors represent sources of contamination, pathways for contaminants to enter water supplies, and breakdowns in barriers to contamination. These different sanitary risk factor types have different and inter-dependent effects on water quality.
机译:在低,中和高收入环境中使用卫生检查来评估水源处微生物污染的风险。但是,卫生检查与水质之间的关系还没有被很好地理解。我们进行了重要的文献综述并综合了25项研究的结果,比较了卫生检查和微生物水质分析的结果。大多数研究使用了不合标准的卫生检查和水质分析方法,并进行了不代表这种关系复杂性的简单比较。在21项研究(84%)中,使用卫生风险评分代表了卫生检查结果;其中12(57%)发现得分与微生物水质之间存在显着关联,而9(43%)则没有。参与式卫生检查(12%)和向社区报告结果(24%)的情况很少见。大多数研究依靠基于实验室的水质分析作为独立的足够的安全度量,但报告的质量控制不足(52%)和/或不合格的样品处理方法(66%)。我们发现,卫生检查可以通过以下四种机制来改善水安全:指导单个水源的补救措施,允许运营商和外部支持计划优先进行维修,确定计划问题并为研究做出贡献。在计划执行卫生检查,数据分析和报告时,应考虑卫生检查的目的,以确保采用适当的方法并使结果适合目的。进一步的研究应认识到,卫生风险因素代表污染源,污染物进入水源的途径以及污染障碍的破坏。这些不同的卫生风险因素类型对水质具有不同且相互依存的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号