...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Biodiversity within the city: Effects of land sharing and land sparing urban development on avian diversity
【24h】

Biodiversity within the city: Effects of land sharing and land sparing urban development on avian diversity

机译:城市内的生物多样性:土地共享和节约土地的城市发展对鸟类多样性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Urbanization, one of the most extreme human-induced environmental changes, is negatively affecting biodiversity worldwide, strongly suggesting that we should reconcile urban development with conservation. Urbanization can follow two extreme types of development within a continuum: land sharing (buildings mixed with dispersed green space) or land sparing (buildings interspersed with green patches that concentrate biodiversity-supporting vegetation). Recent local-scale studies indicate that biodiversity is typically favored by land sparing. We investigated which of these two types of urbanization is associated with a higher taxonomic (i.e. species richness), functional, and phylogenetic diversity of birds. To do so, we collected information on breeding and wintering bird assemblages in 45 land-sharing and 45 land-sparing areas in nine European cities, which provide the first attempt to explore this question using a large geographical scale and temporal replication. We found that land-sharing urban areas were significantly associated with a higher taxonomic and functional diversity of birds during winter, but not during the breeding season (with only a marginally significant effect for functional diversity). We found no association between the type of urban development and phylogenetic diversity. Our findings indicate that not all components of avian diversity are similarly affected by these two means of urban planning and highlight the importance of integrating the temporal perspective into this kind of studies. Our results also offer useful information to the current debate about the trade-off between biodiversity conservation and human well-being in the context of land sharing and sparing urban practices. In addition, we found that certain small-scale urban landscape characteristics (i.e. few impervious surfaces, high water or tree cover) and human practices (i.e. bird feeders or plants with berries) can help maintaining more diverse urban bird assemblages. We provide specific suggestions for both policymakers and citizens that hopefully will help to create more biodiversity-friendly cities in the future.
机译:城市化是人类最极端的环境变化之一,对世界范围内的生物多样性产生了消极影响,强烈表明我们应该使城市发展与自然保护相协调。城市化可以在一个连续性中遵循两种极端的发展方式:土地共享(建筑物与分散的绿色空间混合在一起)或土地节约(建筑物中散布着绿色的斑点,这些斑点集中了支持生物多样性的植被)。最近的地方规模研究表明,节约土地通常有利于生物多样性。我们调查了这两种类型的城市化中的哪一种与鸟类的更高分类学(即物种丰富度),功能和系统发育多样性相关。为此,我们收集了欧洲9个城市中45个土地共享区域和45个土地保护区域的繁殖和越冬鸟类组合的信息,这是首次尝试使用较大的地理规模和时间复制来探讨这一问题。我们发现,在冬季,但在繁殖季节,与城市较高的鸟类的分类和功能多样性显着相关,而在繁殖季节则没有(对功能多样性的影响很小)。我们发现城市发展类型和系统发育多样性之间没有关联。我们的研究结果表明,并非鸟类多样性的所有组成部分都受到这两种城市规划方式的类似影响,并强调了将时空观点纳入此类研究的重要性。我们的结果也为当前关于在土地共享和节约城市习俗的背景下生物多样性保护与人类福祉之间的权衡取舍的辩论提供了有用的信息。此外,我们发现某些小规模的城市景观特征(即不透水的表面,高水位或树木遮盖物)和人类行为(例如,喂鸟器或有浆果的植物)可以帮助维持更多种类的城市鸟类。我们为政策制定者和公民提供具体建议,希望这些建议将有助于将来创建更多对生物多样性友好的城市。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号