...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Technology review and data analysis for cost assessment of water treatment systems
【24h】

Technology review and data analysis for cost assessment of water treatment systems

机译:技术审查和数据分析,用于水处理系统的成本评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A wide variety of water sources, treatment methods, and recycling options have created amyriad of water management options. For modeling of sustainablewater treatment options, computationally efficientmodelsmay be required. This paper provides a comprehensive and comparative review of the water management systems and the associated economic, environmental, and performance metrics. The water management systems are represented as a network of sources, users, technologies, recycling options, and quality of water. Special attention is given to desalination systems. The two main technology categories currently used for desalination are thermal (e.g., Multistage Flash "MSF", Multi-Effect Distillation "MED", and Mechanical Vapor Compression "MVC") and membrane (e.g., seawater reverse osmosis "SWRO", brackish water reverse osmosis "BWRO"). The cost assessment includes a capital cost comparison (for which regression analysis has been used to account for the nonlinear nature of the capacity-cost curves), an operating cost comparison, which includes energy requirements, labor costs, chemicals used, maintenance and repair costs, membrane replacement costs and a unit product cost ($/m(3)) breakdown, which combines the capital and operating costs. Numerous data were collected for the cost of desalination systems. Statistical methods were then used to analyze these collected data to establish deeper understanding of the relationship to capital cost, operating cost, capacity, constraints due to treatment method capabilities, requirements of the users. The paper also briefly discusses other cost considerations such as the water intake and distribution costs. The environmental impacts (concentrate disposal and CO2 footprint) have also been compared for the various technologies considered. Some integration strategies such as use of hybrid systems, cogeneration plants and use of renewable energy have shown reductions in cost associated due to energy consumption and thereby, reducing the unit product cost. Finally, the paper provides a selection guide suitable for various situations with consideration of the different factors affecting cost, environmental impact and energy demands. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:各种各样的水源,处理方法和回收选项创造了无数的水管理选项。对于可持续水处理方案的建模,可能需要计算有效的模型。本文对水管理系统以及相关的经济,环境和绩效指标进行了全面的比较评估。水资源管理系统代表着一个由水源,用户,技术,回收选项和水质组成的网络。特别关注淡化系统。当前用于脱盐的两个主要技术类别是热法(例如,多级闪蒸“ MSF”,多效蒸馏“ MED”和机械蒸汽压缩“ MVC”)和膜(例如海水反渗透) “ SWRO ”,微咸水反渗透“ BWRO ”)。成本评估包括资本成本比较(已使用回归分析来说明容量成本曲线的非线性性质),运营成本比较,其中包括能源需求,人工成本,所用化学品,维护和维修成本,膜更换成本和单位产品成本($ / m(3))细分,其中包括资本和运营成本。收集了许多有关海水淡化系统成本的数据。然后使用统计方法来分析这些收集的数据,以建立对与资本成本,运营成本,生产能力,由于处理方法的能力而引起的约束,用户需求之间的关系的更深入了解。本文还简要讨论了其他成本考虑因素,例如取水和供水成本。还针对所考虑的各种技术对环境影响(浓缩物处置和二氧化碳足迹)进行了比较。一些整合策略,例如使用混合动力系统,热电联产电厂和使用可再生能源,已显示出由于能源消耗而降低了相关成本,从而降低了单位产品成本。最后,本文提供了适合各种情况的选择指南,其中考虑了影响成本,环境影响和能源需求的不同因素。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号