首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >The influence of spatial patterning on modeling PM_(2.5) constituents in Eastern Massachusetts
【24h】

The influence of spatial patterning on modeling PM_(2.5) constituents in Eastern Massachusetts

机译:空间模式对马萨诸塞州东部PM_(2.5)成分建模的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Geostatistical exposure methods for air pollution have inherent uncertainties, resulting in varying levels of exposure misclassification. In this study, we propose that areas representing dusters of PM2.5 elements are potential predictor variables to be included in spatial models for particle composition. The inclusion of these clusters may minimize the exposure misclassification. We evaluated the influence of spatial patterning on modeling of 10 components of ambient PM2.5, which included Al, Cu, Fe, K. Ni. Pb, S, Ti, V, and Zn. This study was performed in three stages. First, we applied a hybrid approach (combination of Empirical Bayesian Kriging and land use regression) to estimate spatial variability for each one of the 10 components of ambient PM2.5. In this stage, we accounted for numerous predictors representing land use, transportation, demographic, and geographical characteristics. In the second stage, we applied the same hybrid approach adding clusters of each PM2.5 component to the set of predictor variables. The clusters here were estimated by a multivariate clustering approach based on k means. Finally, in the last stage, we compared the estimates obtained from the model without clusters (first stage) and the model with clusters (second stage). Overall, our findings suggest significant influence of spatial dusters on modeling some PM2.5 components. We observed that the clusters may affect the error of the prediction values and especially the proportion of explained variance for most of the PM2.5 constituents evaluated in this study. The model with cluster presented a better performance for all PM2.5 components, except for Pb. which the R-2 value decreased 8.51% when we included the clusters in the analysis; and for V. which the R-2 value did not change with the clusters. Models for Cu and Fe explained the highest concentration variance. The R-2 value for the model without cluster was 0.55 for both pollutants. When we accounted for clusters, R-2 value increased 13 and 7% for Cu (R-2 = 0.62) and Fe (R-2 = 0.59), respectively. The models for K and S presented the lowest performance for both models with and without cluster (although the model with cluster improved substantially the R-2 values). Better knowledge of the influence of spatial patterns on air pollution modeling should be of interest to policy makers to devise future strategies to improve human exposure assessment to air particulates while controlling for spatial patterns of ambient PM2.5 elemental concentration. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:空气污染的地统计学接触方法具有固有的不确定性,导致不同程度的接触错误分类。在这项研究中,我们建议代表PM2.5元素除尘器的区域是潜在的预测变量,将包含在粒子组成的空间模型中。包含这些簇可以最大程度地减少暴露错误分类。我们评估了空间图案化对环境PM2.5的10个成分(包括Al,Cu,Fe,K。Ni)的建模的影响。铅,硫,钛,钒和锌这项研究分三个阶段进行。首先,我们采用了一种混合方法(经验贝叶斯克里金法和土地利用回归法相结合)来估计环境PM2.5的10个成分中每个成分的空间变异性。在这一阶段,我们考虑了许多代表土地使用,交通,人口和地理特征的预测因素。在第二阶段,我们应用了相同的混合方法,将每个PM2.5组件的簇添加到预测变量集。此处的聚类是基于k均值的多元聚类方法估算的。最后,在最后阶段,我们比较了从没有聚类的模型(第一阶段)和有聚类的模型(第二阶段)获得的估计值。总体而言,我们的发现表明空间除尘器对某些PM2.5组件的建模具有重大影响。我们观察到,该簇可能会影响预测值的误差,尤其是影响本研究中评估的大​​多数PM2.5成分的解释方差的比例。带簇的模型对除Pb以外的所有PM2.5组件均具有更好的性能。当我们将聚类纳入分析时,R-2值降低了8.51%;对于V.,其R-2值不会随簇变化。铜和铁的模型解释了最高的浓度变化。对于两种污染物,无簇模型的R-2值为0.55。当我们考虑簇时,Cu(R-2 = 0.62)和Fe(R-2 = 0.59)的R-2值分别增加13和7%。对于具有集群和不具有集群的模型,K和S模型的性能最低(尽管具有集群的模型大大提高了R-2值)。政策制定者应该对更好地了解空间格局对空气污染建模的影响感兴趣,以制定未来的策略,以改善人类对空气微粒的暴露评估,同时控制周围PM2.5元素浓度的空间格局。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号