首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Effects of land use and sustainable land management practices on runoff and soil loss in the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
【24h】

Effects of land use and sustainable land management practices on runoff and soil loss in the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia

机译:埃塞俄比亚上尼罗河上游流域的土地利用和可持续土地管理做法对径流和土壤流失的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Understanding the effect of land use and sustainable land management (SLM) practices on runoff and soil loss (SL) is essential for adopting suitable strategies to control soil erosion. The purpose of this study was to analyze runoff and SL from different land use types and evaluate the effectiveness of different SLM practices through monitoring runoff and sediment from 42 runoff plots (30 m x 6 m) in different agro-ecologies of the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia. Four treatments for croplands (control, soil bund, Fanya juu, and soil bund reinforced with grass) and three treatments for non-croplands (control, exclosure, and exclosure with trenches) were investigated during the rainy seasons. The results showed that runoff and SL varied greatly depending on agro-ecology, land use type, and SLM practice. Seasonal runoff ranged from 52 to 810 mm in 2015 and 37 to 898 mm in 2016, whereas SL ranged from 0.07 to 39.67 t ha(-1) and 0.01 to 24.70 t ha(-1). The highest rates were observed from untreated grazing land in the midland agro-ecology, largely because of heavy grazing and the occurrence of intense rain events. Runoff and SL were both significantly lower (P 0.05) in SLM plots than in control plots. On average, seasonal runoff was reduced by 11% to 68%, and SL by 38% to 94% in SLM plots. Soil bund reinforced with grass in croplands and exclosure with trenches in non-croplands were found to be the most effective SLM practices for reducing both runoff and SL. Integrating structural and vegetative measures was therefore found to be the best way to control soil erosion and its consequences. Additional investigation is needed in consideration of ecological succession and other possible effects of these types of integrated measures, for example, the effects on soil properties, biomass, and biodiversity. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
机译:了解土地使用和可持续土地管理(SLM)做法对径流和土壤流失(SL)的影响,对于采取适当的策略控制土壤侵蚀至关重要。这项研究的目的是分析来自不同土地利用类型的径流和SL,并通过监测上蓝尼罗河流域不同农业生态系统中42个径流区(30 mx 6 m)的径流和沉积物,评估不同的土地管理方法的有效性。埃塞俄比亚。在雨季期间,对耕地的四种处理方法(对照,土壤障壁,番Fan树和用草加固的土壤障壁)和非耕地的三种处理方法(对照,排除和沟渠遮盖)进行了研究。结果表明,径流和SL的变化取决于农业生态,土地利用类型和SLM实践。 2015年季节径流量范围为52至810毫米,2016年为37至898毫米,而SL范围为0.07至39.67 t ha(-1)和0.01至24.70 t ha(-1)。在中部农业生态学中,未经处理的放牧地观测到的发生率最高,主要是由于大量放牧和强烈降雨事件的发生。 SLM图中的径流和SL均显着低于对照图(P <0.05)。平均而言,SLM地块的季节性径流减少了11%至68%,SL减少了38%至94%。人们发现,在农田中用草加固的土壤障壁和在非作物地中用沟渠掩盖是减少径流和SL的最有效的SLM措施。因此,发现综合采取结构性措施和植物性措施是控制土壤侵蚀及其后果的最佳方法。考虑到生态演替以及这些类型的综合措施的其他可能影响,例如,对土壤特性,生物量和生物多样性的影响,需要进行进一步调查。 (c)2018作者。由Elsevier B.V.发布。这是CC BY-NC-ND许可下的开放获取文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号