首页> 外文期刊>Science and technology of nuclear installation >Uncertainty Analyses Applied to the UAM/TMI-1 Lattice Calculations Using the DRAGON (Version 4.05) Code and Based on JENDL-4 and ENDF/B-Ⅶ.1 Covariance Data
【24h】

Uncertainty Analyses Applied to the UAM/TMI-1 Lattice Calculations Using the DRAGON (Version 4.05) Code and Based on JENDL-4 and ENDF/B-Ⅶ.1 Covariance Data

机译:使用DRAGON(版本4.05)代码并基于JENDL-4和ENDF /B-Ⅶ.1协方差数据对UAM / TMI-1晶格进行不确定性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The OECD/NEA Uncertainty Analysis in Modeling (UAM) expert group organized and launched the UAM benchmark. Its main objective is to perform uncertainty analysis in light water reactor (LWR) predictions at all modeling stages. In this paper, multigroup microscopic cross-sectional uncertainties are propagated through the DRAGON (version 4.05) lattice code in order to perform uncertainty analysis on k_∞ and 2-group homogenized macroscopic cross-sections. The chosen test case corresponds to the Three Mile Island-1 (TMI-1) lattice, which is a 15 × 15 pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel assembly segment with poison and at full power conditions. A statistical methodology is employed for the uncertainty assessment, where cross-sections of certain isotopes of various elements belonging to the 172-group DRAGLIB library format are considered as normal random variables. Two libraries were created for such purposes, one based on JENDL-4 data and the other one based on the recently released ENDF/B-Ⅶ.1 data. Therefore, multigroup uncertainties based on both nuclear data libraries needed to be computed for the different isotopic reactions by means of ERRORJ. The uncertainty assessment performed on k_∞ and macroscopic cross-sections, that is based on JENDL-4 data, was much higher than the assessment based on ENDF/B-Ⅶ.1 data. It was found that the computed Uranium 235 fission covariance matrix based on JENDL-4 is much larger at the thermal and resonant regions than, for instance, the covariance matrix based on ENDF/B-Ⅶ.1 data. This can be the main cause of significant discrepancies between different uncertainty assessments.
机译:OECD / NEA建模不确定性分析(UAM)专家组组织并启动了UAM基准测试。其主要目的是在所有建模阶段的轻水堆(LWR)预测中执行不确定性分析。在本文中,通过DRAGON(版本4.05)晶格代码传播多组微观截面不确定性,以便对k_∞和2组均化的宏观截面进行不确定性分析。所选的测试用例对应于三英里岛1(TMI-1)晶格,该晶格是15×15压水堆(PWR)燃料组件段,带有毒药且处于全功率条件。采用统计方法进行不确定性评估,其中将属于172组DRAGLIB库格式的各种元素的某些同位素的横截面视为正常随机变量。为此目的创建了两个库,一个基于JENDL-4数据,另一个基于最近发布的ENDF /B-Ⅶ.1数据。因此,需要通过ERRORJ为不同的同位素反应计算基于两个核数据库的多组不确定性。基于JENDL-4数据在k_∞和宏观截面上执行的不确定性评估远高于基于ENDF /B-Ⅶ.1数据的评估。已经发现,基于JENDL-4的铀235裂变协方差矩阵在热和共振区域要比例如基于ENDF /B-Ⅶ.1数据的协方差矩阵大得多。这可能是不同不确定性评估之间存在重大差异的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号