首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Morals, Materials, and Technoscience: The Energy Security Imaginary in the United States
【24h】

Morals, Materials, and Technoscience: The Energy Security Imaginary in the United States

机译:道德,材料和技术科学:美国的能源安全想象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article advances recent scholarship on energy security by arguing that the concept is best understood as a sociotechnical imaginary, a collective vision for a "good society" realized through technoscientific-oriented policies. Focusing on the 1952 Resources for Freedom report, the authors trace the genealogy of energy security, elucidating how it establishes a morality of efficiency that orients policy action under the guise of security toward the liberalizing of markets in resource states and a robust program of energy research and development in the United States. This evidence challenges the pervasive historical anchoring of the concept in the 1970s and illustrates the importance of the genealogical approach for the emerging literature on energy and sociotechnical imaginaries. Exploring the genealogy of energy security also unpacks key social, political, and economic undercurrents that disrupt the seeming universality of the language of energy, leading the authors to question whether energy security discourse is appropriate for guiding policy action during ongoing global energy transitions.
机译:本文认为,最好将这一概念理解为社会技术的虚构概念,这是通过以技术科学为导向的政策实现的“良好社会”的集体愿景,从而推动了有关能源安全的最新研究。作者着眼于1952年的《自由资源》报告,追溯了能源安全的家谱,阐明了它如何建立效率的道德观,以安全为幌子将政策行动定位为资源国市场的自由化和强有力的能源研究计划和美国的发展。这一证据挑战了该概念在1970年代的广泛历史锚定,并说明了族谱方法对于新兴的能源和社会技术虚构文学的重要性。探索能源安全的谱系还揭示了扰乱能源语言通用性的主要社会,政治和经济暗流,这使作者质疑能源安全的话语是否适合在正在进行的全球能源转型期间指导政策行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号