首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement: A European Study
【24h】

Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement: A European Study

机译:一项欧洲研究,最大限度地提高公众参与的政策影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a lack of published evidence which demonstrates the impacts of public engagement (PE) in science and technology policy. This might represent the failure of PE to achieve policy impacts or indicate a lack of effective procedures for discerning the uptake by policy makers of PE-derived outputs. While efforts have been made to identify and categorize different types of policy impact, research has rarely attempted to link policy impact with PE procedures, political procedures, or the connections between them. In this article, we propose a simple conceptual model to capture this information, based on semistructured interviews with both policy makers and PE practitioners. A range of criteria are identified to increase the policy impact of PE. The role of PE practitioners in realizing impacts through their interactions with policy makers in the informal "in-between" spaces of public engagement is emphasized. However, the potential contradictions between the pursuit of policy impacts and the more traditional conceptualizations of PE effectiveness are discussed. The main barrier to the identification of policy impacts from PE may lie within policy processes themselves. Political institutions have responsibility to establish formalized procedures for monitoring the uptake and use of evidence from PE in their decision-making processes.
机译:缺乏公开的证据来证明公众参与(PE)对科学技术政策的影响。这可能表示私募股权公司未能实现政策影响,或者表明缺乏有效的程序来识别政策制定者对私募股权衍生产品的吸收。尽管已经做出努力来识别和分类不同类型的政策影响,但很少进行研究来尝试将政策影响与体育教育程序,政治程序或它们之间的联系联系起来。在本文中,我们基于对决策者和体育从业者的半结构化访谈,提出了一个简单的概念模型来捕获此信息。确定了一系列标准,以增加PE的政策影响。强调了体育从业者在与公众非正式的“中间”空间中与决策者的互动中实现影响的作用。但是,讨论了在追求政策影响与传统的体育有效性概念之间的潜在矛盾。确定私募股权对政策影响的主要障碍可能在于政策流程本身。政治机构有责任建立正式的程序,以监督其决策过程中PE证据的使用和使用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science, Technology and Human Values》 |2015年第3期|421-444|共24页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Rural Economy, School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK,School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbas-ton, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK;

    Science and Society Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands;

    Centre for Rural Economy, School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    public engagement; policy impact; practitioners;

    机译:公众参与;政策影响;从业者;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:19:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号