首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Let's Not Talk About Science: The Normalization of Big Science and the Moral Economy of Modern Astronomy
【24h】

Let's Not Talk About Science: The Normalization of Big Science and the Moral Economy of Modern Astronomy

机译:让我们不要谈论科学:大科学的规范化与现代天文学的道德经济

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the 1990s, the Dutch astronomical community had to choose its next big telescope project. The starting point of their discussions was not a plan in search of support, but a scientific community in search of a plan. Their discussion demonstrates how big science projects are an integral part of the moral and institutional economy of modern astronomy. Large telescopes are unique but not exceptional: big science has become part of "normal science," both scientifically and institutionally. In retrospect, the discussions anaylized in this paper discussions concern the earliest phase of three major astronomical instruments: the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA), the Square Kilometer Array (SKA), and the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR). Interestingly, the Dutch astronomers focused on what they called "strategic" arguments, explicitly excluding arguments regarding scientific merit. I demonstrate how this should be understood in the context of the moral economy of the community. This analysis, based on rich archive material and background interviews with key actors, adds to our understanding of big science or "megascience" in the post-Cold War era.
机译:在1990年代,荷兰天文界不得不选择下一个大型望远镜项目。他们讨论的出发点不是寻求支持的计划,而是寻求计划的科学共同体。他们的讨论表明,大型科学项目如何成为现代天文学的道德和制度经济学的组成部分。大型望远镜是独特的,但并非例外:无论是在科学上还是在制度上,大科学都已成为“正常科学”的一部分。回想起来,本文讨论中被分析的讨论涉及三个主要天文仪器的最早阶段:阿塔卡马大毫米波阵列(ALMA),平方公里阵列(SKA)和低频阵列(LOFAR)。有趣的是,荷兰的天文学家专注于他们所谓的“战略”论点,明确地排除了有关科学价值的论点。我展示了如何在社区道德经济的背景下理解这一点。该分析基于丰富的档案资料和对主要演员的背景访谈,进一步增强了我们对冷战后时代的大科学或“大科学”的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号