首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology and Human Values >Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Road map
【24h】

Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Road map

机译:政策科学与技术研究:英国合成生物学路线图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we reflect on our experience as science and technology studies (STS) researchers who were members of the working group that produced A Synthetic Biology Roadmap for the UK in 2012. We explore how this initiative sought to govern an uncertain future and describe how it was successfully used to mobilize public funds for synthetic biology from the UK government. We discuss our attempts to incorporate the insights and sensibilities of STS into the policy process and why we chose to use the concept of responsible research and innovation to do so. We analyze how the roadmapping process, and the final report, narrowed and transformed our contributions to the roadmap. We show how difficult it is for STS researchers to influence policy when our ideas challenge deeply entrenched pervasive assumptions, framings, and narratives about how technological innovation necessarily leads to economic progress, about public reticence as a roadblock to that progress, and about the supposed separation between science and society. We end by reflecting on the constraints under which we were operating from the outset and on the challenges for STS in policy.
机译:在本文中,我们回顾了我们作为科学技术研究(STS)研究人员的经验,这些研究人员是2012年为英国制定了《合成生物学路线图》的工作组的成员。我们探讨了该计划如何寻求治理不确定的未来并描述如何成功地从英国政府动员公共资金用于合成生物学。我们讨论了将STS的见识和敏感性纳入政策制定过程的尝试,以及为什么我们选择使用负责任的研究和创新理念来这样做。我们分析了路线图制定过程以及最终报告如何缩小和转变了我们对路线图的贡献。我们展示了当我们的想法挑战着根深蒂固的普遍假设,构架和叙事时,STS研究人员很难对政策产生影响。这些假设,定论和叙事涉及技术创新如何必定会导致经济进步,公众沉默寡言是阻碍这一进步的障碍以及所谓的分离在科学与社会之间。最后,我们从一开始就反思我们所面临的制约因素以及STS在政策方面所面临的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号