...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >The precautionary principle and democratizing expertise: a US perspective
【24h】

The precautionary principle and democratizing expertise: a US perspective

机译:预防原则和民主专长:美国的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Democratizing expertise carries many implications for application of the precautionary principle. It can extend the amount and types of information incorporated into decisions, empower citizens, and ensure that experts alone are not charged with making value-laden decisions. It can also expose uncertainties in science and decision-making, and bring forth unrecognized alternative solutions to problems. In this article, we outline the implications of democratizing expertise on implementation of the precautionary principle in a US context, as well as barriers and opportunities. We argue that initiatives to democratize expertise and implement precaution in the United States will occur first at the local and regional level as a result of grassroots momentum for change.
机译:使专门知识民主化对预防原则的应用有很多影响。它可以扩展决策中包含的信息的数量和类型,增强公民权能,并确保仅专家一个人就不承担制定有价值的决策的责任。它还可能暴露科学和决策中的不确定性,并提出无法识别的替代解决方案。在本文中,我们概述了将专业知识民主化对美国实施预防原则的影响以及障碍和机遇。我们认为,由于基层的变革势头,使美国的专业知识民主化并采取预防措施的举措将首先在地方和地区一级发生。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2003年第3期|p. 213-218|共6页
  • 作者

    Joel A Tickner; Sara Wright;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Work Environment, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lower, One University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 USA;

    Research Associate, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号