...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Refraining norms: boundary maintenance and partial accommodations in the work of academic technology transfer
【24h】

Refraining norms: boundary maintenance and partial accommodations in the work of academic technology transfer

机译:限制规范:学术技术转让工作中的边界维护和部分适应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Much has been written about the commercialization of academic research and the role of technology transfer (TT) in mobilizing public sector science. Much of this literature maps a process of institutional isomorphism through which the norms of academy and industry are seen to grow increasingly aligned, facilitated, in part, by new organizations such as offices of technology transfer. Yet questions remain about how fulsome this process has been, with some scholars exploring concurrent processes that re-inscribe boundaries and clarify important social distinctions between commercial and non-commercial ends. We report the result of a qualitative study of TT professionals in Canada to explore the complex nature of the 'renormalization' process. We argue that TT professionals solicit industry involvement but accommodate the demands of industry only in part; in turn, they solicit academic involvement by reframing the demands and priorities of commercialization along more academic lines. Ironically, by reframing the norms of commercialization, TT professionals effectively reinforce boundaries between the academy and industry and secure only a partial accommodation by academics to industrial norms. We conclude by raising questions about the meaning of traditional metrics of commercial success for innovation policy.
机译:关于学术研究的商业化以及技术转让(TT)在动员公共部门科学中的作用,已经有很多著作。这些文献大部分都描绘了一种制度上的同构过程,通过这种过程,学术界和工业界的规范日益紧密地结合在一起,并在一定程度上受到诸如技术转让办公室之类的新组织的推动。然而,关于这一过程的有效性仍存在疑问,一些学者探索了同时存在的过程,这些过程重新界定了边界并阐明了商业和非商业目的之间的重要社会区别。我们报告了加拿大TT专业人员定性研究的结果,以探索“重新规范化”过程的复杂性。我们认为,TT专业人士会吸引行业参与,但只能部分满足行业需求。反过来,他们通过沿更多的学术领域重新定义商业化的要求和优先事项,从而吸引了学术界的参与。具有讽刺意味的是,通过重新定义商业化规范,TT专业人员有效地加强了学术界与行业之间的界限,并确保学者只能部分适应工业规范。最后,我们通过提出有关传统商业成功指标对创新政策的含义提出疑问。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Public Policy》 |2010年第9期|p.689-701|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Criminology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Rm. 126 Grand River Hall, 73 George Street, Brantford ON, Canada N3T 2Y3;

    Department of Health Policy, Man- agement and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M6;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号