...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Competition and concentration in the academic research industry: An empirical analysis of the sector dynamics in Australia 1990-2008
【24h】

Competition and concentration in the academic research industry: An empirical analysis of the sector dynamics in Australia 1990-2008

机译:学术研究行业的竞争和集中度:对澳大利亚1990-2008年行业动态的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the last two or three decades, many countries have used various market instruments to steer and manage their academic research sector. Proponents of a market approach claim greater efficiency and sharper incentives while critics point to the peculiarity of the university sector that is likely to cause an inefficient stratification amongst universities. This paper applies a market convergence model to empirically test the hypothesis that competition leads to a more concentrated research industry. The results from Australia show that less research-intensive universities improve their research performance relatively faster, particularly in the early years of the policy reform. However, the lower performing universities have not been 'catching up' with the top performers but maximizing their individual potential, given their unique productivity constraints. We cannot confirm a 'winner-takes-all' process but there are signs of an increasing gap between universities, most likely due to accumulating advantages in the academic research sector.
机译:在过去的两三个十年中,许多国家/地区使用了各种市场工具来指导和管理其学术研究部门。市场方法的支持者主张更高的效率和更强的激励机制,而批评者则指出大学部门的特殊性很可能导致大学之间的低效率分层。本文运用市场趋同模型来实证检验竞争导致研究行业更加集中的假设。澳大利亚的结果表明,研究强度较低的大学相对而言,其研究绩效的提升相对较快,尤其是在政策改革的初期。然而,由于其独特的生产力局限性,表现欠佳的大学并没有“赶上”表现最好的大学,而是最大限度地发挥了各自的潜力。我们无法确定“赢者通吃”的过程,但是有迹象表明大学之间的差距正在扩大,这很可能是由于学术研究领域积累的优势所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号