...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Performance-based research funding in EU Member States-a comparative assessment
【24h】

Performance-based research funding in EU Member States-a comparative assessment

机译:基于绩效的欧盟成员国研究资金 - 比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Performance-based research funding (PBRF), the allocation of institutional funding on the basis of ex post assessments of university research performance, has been implemented in a large number of EU Member States. However, the characteristics of this funding scheme differ widely. Apart from differences in the volume of funding, there are major variations in the assessments that feed into the funding allocation formula. Even within the two main groups of metrics based and peer review-based assessments the approaches adopted vary. Some of the main strengths and drawbacks of the various options are discussed in this article. An analysis of national Global Budgetary Allocations for R&D data reveals the distribution of project and institutional funding and the potential for PBRF. Given the heterogeneity of performance-based funding approaches, a comprehensive comparative assessment of the funding involved in this instrument requires further work. Nonetheless Member State governments can engage in institutional learning from good practices.
机译:基于绩效的研究资金(PBRF),在大学研究绩效的前后评估的基础上,在大量欧盟成员国实施了机构资金的配置。然而,这种融资方案的特征差异很大。除了资金量的差异外,还存在评估的主要变化,进入资金分配公式。即使在基于同行评审的基于指标的两个主要群体中,采用的方法也有所不同。本文讨论了各种选项的一些主要优势和缺点。对研发数据的国家全球预算拨款分析揭示了项目和机构资金的分配以及PBRF的潜力。鉴于基于绩效的融资方法的异质性,对本文中涉及的资金的全面比较评估需要进一步的工作。尽管如此,成员国各国政府可以从良好做法中参与体制学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号