首页> 外文期刊>Science and Public Policy >Effectiveness of public procurement of innovation versus supply-side innovation measures in manufacturing and service sectors
【24h】

Effectiveness of public procurement of innovation versus supply-side innovation measures in manufacturing and service sectors

机译:公共采购创新的有效性与制造和服务部门的供应方创新措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Most quantitative evaluations report positive but small effects of supply-side innovation measures. Although the literature suggests that demand-side measures, in particular, public procurement of innovation, might be more effective in stimulating innovation than supply-side measures, empirical evidence on this proposition is scarce. To empirically test this proposition, we utilize the Eurobarometer 2014 survey to estimate the effects from public procurement of innovation as well as from the supply-side innovation measures on product and process innovations in manufacturing and service firms in the USA and Europe. Our findings suggest that the treatment effects of public procurement of innovation are indeed larger than the effects of supply-side public support on product innovation in both manufacturing and service sectors. This finding also holds for process innovation, but only in the service sector. In contrast, in manufacturing firms, the estimated effects on process innovation are only positive and significant in firms receiving public support.
机译:大多数量化评估报告了供应方创新措施的正则但小的影响。虽然文献表明,特别是采取的需求方措施,特别是对创新的公共采购,可能在刺激创新方面比供应方面措施更有效,但对这一命题的实证证据稀缺。为了经验测试这一命题,我们利用Eurobarometer 2014调查来估计来自美国和欧洲制造业和服务公司的产品和流程创新的供应方创新措施,从而估计公共采购的影响。我们的研究结果表明,公共采购创新的治疗效果确实大于供应方公众对制造和服务部门产品创新的影响。这一发现还持有流程创新,但仅适用于服务部门。相比之下,在制造企业中,对进程创新的估计效果仅在获得公共支持的公司中唯一积极而重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号