首页> 外文期刊>Science news >MYTH OF THE BAD-NOSE BIRDS: Study of avian sense of smell recovers from Audubon's blunder
【24h】

MYTH OF THE BAD-NOSE BIRDS: Study of avian sense of smell recovers from Audubon's blunder

机译:鸟鼻误区的神话:从奥杜邦的失误中恢复了鸟类嗅觉的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Blame Audubon. Animal behaviorist Timothy Roper says that the renowned naturalist prepagated die-hard misunderstandings of birds' sense of smell. In 1826, he published on the habits of the turkey vulture "with a View to Exploding the Opinion Generally Held of Its Extraordinary Power of Smelling." Observers as far back as Aristotle had claimed that various vultures sniff their way to prey. Yet Audubon argued that they couldn't smell. He described hiding smelly meat close to caged turkey vultures. They showed no sign of noticing. Many people today still think that, birds don't have working noses, and biologists often assume that the sense of smell doesn't matter much in avian lifestyles, says Roper. Yet decades of studies have shown that birds do have a sense of smell, sometimes as fine as some mammals'. Turkey vultures, for example, can pick up faint traces of certain odors. A classic report in the 1960s noted that California-gas-company repair crews found leaks in their lines by watching for circling turkey vultures attracted to the carrionlike scent added to the gas as a safety alert.
机译:怪奥杜邦。动物行为主义者蒂莫西·罗珀(Timothy Roper)说,著名的自然主义者对鸟类的嗅觉产生了顽固的误解。 1826年,他发表了关于火鸡兀鹰的习俗,“以期探讨普遍认为其具有极高的嗅觉能力”。早在亚里士多德曾声称各种秃鹰嗅捕猎物的观察者。但奥杜邦辩称他们闻不到。他描述了在笼养火鸡兀鹰附近藏有臭味的肉。他们没有注意到的迹象。 Roper说,今天许多人仍然认为,鸟没有鼻子可工作,生物学家经常认为,嗅觉在禽类的生活方式中并不重要。然而数十年的研究表明,鸟类确实有嗅觉,有时和某些哺乳动物一样。例如,土耳其秃鹰可能会闻到某些气味的微弱痕迹。 1960年代的一份经典报告指出,加利福尼亚的天然气公司维修人员通过观察盘旋的火鸡兀鹰,发现它们的管路中有泄漏,这种火鸡兀鹰被吸引到腐臭味的气味中被吸引,这是安全警报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号