...
首页> 外文期刊>Science and Engineering Ethics >A Qualitative Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Training Development: Identification of Metacognitive Strategies
【24h】

A Qualitative Approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Training Development: Identification of Metacognitive Strategies

机译:研究负责任的行为(RCR)培训发展的定性方法:元认知策略的确定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training is common in the sciences, the effectiveness of RCR training is open to question. Three key factors appear to be particularly important in ensuring the effectiveness of ethics education programs: (1) educational efforts should be tied to day-to-day practices in the field, (2) educational efforts should provide strategies for working through the ethical problems people are likely to encounter in day-to-day practice, and (3) educational efforts should be embedded in a broader program of on-going career development efforts. This article discusses a complex qualitative approach to RCR training development, based on a sensemaking model, which strives to address the afore-mentioned training concerns. Ethnographic observations and prior RCR training served the purpose of collecting information specific to a multi-disciplinary and multi-university research center with the goal of identifying metacognitive reasoning strategies that would facilitate ethical decision-making. The extensive qualitative analyses resulted in the identification of nine metacognitive reasoning strategies on which future RCR training will be developed. The implications of the findings for RCR training in the sciences are discussed.
机译:尽管负责任的研究行为(RCR)培训在科学界很普遍,但RCR培训的有效性尚有待商question。对于确保道德教育计划的有效性而言,三个关键因素显得尤为重要:(1)教育工作应与该领域的日常实践联系在一起;(2)教育工作应提供解决道德问题的策略人们很可能会在日常实践中遇到这些问题,并且(3)教育工作应纳入正在进行的职业发展工作的更广泛计划中。本文讨论了一种基于感官模型的RCR培训开发的复杂定性方法,该模型致力于解决上述培训问题。人种学观察和先前的RCR培训的目的是收集特定于多学科和多大学研究中心的信息,其目的是确定有助于道德决策的元认知推理策略。广泛的定性分析确定了九种元认知推理策略,并将在此基础上发展未来的RCR培训。讨论了研究结果对RCR科学培训的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science and Engineering Ethics》 |2008年第1期|3-31|共29页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology University of Oklahoma 455 W. Lindsey Street Dale Hall Tower Room 705 Norman OK 73019-2007 USA;

    Department of Psychology University of Oklahoma 455 W. Lindsey Street Dale Hall Tower Room 705 Norman OK 73019-2007 USA;

    Department of Anthropology University of Oklahoma 455 W. Lindsey Street Dale Hall Tower Room 521 Norman OK 73019-2007 USA;

    School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma 120 David L. Boren Blvd. Suite 5900 Norman OK 73072-7307 USA;

    Department of Psychology University of Oklahoma 455 W. Lindsey Street Dale Hall Tower Room 705 Norman OK 73019-2007 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Integrity; Ethics; Scientific misconduct; Training; Sensemaking; Qualitative analysis;

    机译:诚信;道德;科学不端行为;培训;意义分析;定性分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号