首页> 外文期刊>Science & Education >Public Reason and Teaching Science in a Multicultural World: a Comment on Cobern and Loving: “An Essay for Educators…’ in the Light of John Rawls’ Political Philosophy
【24h】

Public Reason and Teaching Science in a Multicultural World: a Comment on Cobern and Loving: “An Essay for Educators…’ in the Light of John Rawls’ Political Philosophy

机译:多元文化世界中的公共理性与教学科学:评考伯恩与爱:约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)的政治哲学视角下的“教育家随笔...”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a comment on the article “An Essay for Educators: Epistemological Realism Really is Common Sense” written by Cobern and Loving in Science & Education. The skillful analysis of the two authors concerning the problematic role of scientism in school science is fully appreciated, as is their diagnosis that it is scientism not universal scientific realism which is the cause of epistemological imperialism. But how should science teachers deal with scientism in the concrete every day situation of the science classroom and in contact with classes and students? John Rawls’ concept of public reason offers three “cardinal strategies” to achieve this aim: proviso, declaration and conjecture. The theoretical framework is provided, the three strategies are described and their relevance is fleshed out in a concrete example.
机译:这是对Cobern撰写的《教育家随笔:认识论现实主义确实是常识》一文的评论。两位作者对科学主义在学校科学中的问题性作用的熟练分析得到了充分的赞赏,他们的诊断是认识论帝国主义的起因是科学主义而不是普遍的科学现实主义。但是理科教师应该如何在科学教室的具体日常情况下以及与班级和学生的接触中处理科学主义?约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)的公共理性概念为实现这一目标提供了三种“基本策略”:附带条件,声明和推测。提供了理论框架,描述了这三种策略,并在一个具体示例中充实了它们的相关性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science & Education》 |2009年第8期|p.1095-1100|共6页
  • 作者

    Albert Zeyer;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号