首页> 外文期刊>Science in China. Series E, Technological sciences >Comparison of two design methods of aerodynamic biobjectives for airfoil and wing shapes
【24h】

Comparison of two design methods of aerodynamic biobjectives for airfoil and wing shapes

机译:两种翼型和机翼形状气动双物镜设计方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A simplified adaptive wing, which deflects its leading edge and trailing edge flaps to vary its shape, is calculated to investigate the potential aerodynamic gains and compared with a biobjective optimization (BO) wing in the present paper. In subsonic-transonic flights the deflection angle of a flap is determined through optimization using a deterministic method. In supersonic flight the flaps are not deflected due to the requirement of having a minimum drag. For comparison the aerodynamic characteristics of a BO airfoil and wing is calculated. A parallel genetic algorithm is used in BO. Euler equations served as governing equations in flow field calculation. Numerical results in both 2D (airfoil) and 3D (wing) cases show that aerodynamic performances of the two design airfoils and wings are much better than those of the original ones, with the adaptive design one the best.
机译:计算了一种简化的自适应机翼,它可以偏转其前缘襟翼和后缘襟翼以改变其形状,目的是研究潜在的空气动力学增益,并将其与本研究的双目标优化(BO)机翼进行比较。在亚音速跨音速飞行中,襟翼的偏转角通过使用确定性方法的优化来确定。在超音速飞行中,襟翼不会因为需要最小阻力而偏转。为了比较,计算了BO翼型和机翼的空气动力特性。 BO中使用并行遗传算法。欧拉方程作为流场计算中的控制方程。在2D(机翼)和3D(机翼)情况下的数值结果表明,两种设计的机翼和机翼的空气动力学性能均优于原始机翼和机翼,其中自适应设计是最佳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号