首页> 外文期刊>Schizophrenia Bulletin >Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antipsychotic Medications in Early-Onset Schizophrenia
【24h】

Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antipsychotic Medications in Early-Onset Schizophrenia

机译:第二代抗精神病药在早期精神分裂症中的比较功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Scant information exists to guide pharmacological treatment of early-onset schizophrenia. We examine variation across commonly prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications in medication discontinuation and psychiatric hospital admission among children and adolescents clinically diagnosed with schizophrenia. A 45-state Medicaid claims file (2001–2005) was analyzed focusing on outpatients, aged 6–17 years, diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related disorder prior to starting a new episode of antipsychotic monotherapy with risperidone (n = 805), olanzapine (n = 382), quetiapine (n = 260), aripiprazole (n = 173), or ziprasidone (n = 125). Cox proportional hazard regressions estimated adjusted hazard ratios of 180-day antipsychotic medication discontinuation and 180-day psychiatric hospitalization for patients treated with each medication. During the first 180 days following antipsychotic initiation, most youth treated with quetiapine (70.7%), ziprasidone (73.3%), olanzapine (73.7%), risperidone (74.7%), and aripirazole (76.5%) discontinued their medication (χ2 = 1.69, df = 4, P = .79). Compared with risperidone, the adjusted hazards of antipsychotic discontinuation did not significantly differ for any of the 4-comparator medications. The percentages of youth receiving inpatient psychiatric treatment while receiving their initial antipsychotic medication ranged from 7.19% (aripiprazole) to 9.89% (quetiapine) (χ2 = 0.79, df = 4, P = .94). As compared with risperidone, the adjusted hazard ratio of psychiatric hospital admission was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.57–1.61) for olanzapine, 1.03 (95% CI: 0.59–1.81) for quetiapine, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.43–1.70) for aripiprazole, and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.60–2.51) for ziprasidone. The results suggest that rapid antipsychotic medication discontinuation and psychiatric hospital admission are common in the community treatment of early-onset schizophrenia. No significant differences were detected in risk of either adverse outcome across 5 commonly prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications.
机译:缺乏信息可指导早期发作的精神分裂症的药理治疗。我们在临床诊断为精神分裂症的儿童和青少年中,在停药和精神科住院期间,对常用的第二代抗精神病药物之间的差异进行检查。对45个州的Medicaid索赔文件(2001-2005)进行了分析,重点关注年龄在6-17岁之间,在开始使用利培酮(n = 805),奥氮平(抗精神病药)进行新的抗精神病药物单一疗法之前被诊断为精神分裂症或相关疾病的门诊患者。 n = 382),喹硫平(n = 260),阿立哌唑(n = 173)或齐拉西酮(n = 125)。 Cox比例风险回归估计了每种药物治疗患者180天抗精神病药物停药和180天精神病住院调整的危险比。在开始抗精神病药物治疗后的前180天内,大多数接受喹硫平(70.7%),齐拉西酮(73.3%),奥氮平(73.7%),利培酮(74.7%)和阿立哌唑(76.5%)治疗的年轻人停止用药(χ 2 = 1.69,df = 4,P = .79)。与利培酮相比,抗精神病药停药的调整后危险对于任何四种比较药均无显着差异。在接受初始抗精神病药物治疗的同时接受住院精神科治疗的年轻人的百分比范围为7.19%(阿立哌唑)至9.89%(喹硫平)(χ 2 = 0.79,df = 4,P = 0.94)。与利培酮相比,奥氮平调整后的精神病医院入院风险比为0.96(95%CI:0.57-1.61),喹硫平为1.03(95%CI:0.59-1.81),0.85(95%CI:0.43-1.70)对于阿立哌唑,是1.22(95%CI:0.60–2.51)对于齐拉西酮。结果表明,在早发性精神分裂症的社区治疗中,快速停用抗精神病药物和入院精神科很普遍。在5种常用的第二代抗精神病药物中,任一不良结局的风险均未发现显着差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Schizophrenia Bulletin》 |2012年第4期|p.845-853|共9页
  • 作者单位

    1Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 2New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 3Institute for Health, Health Care Policy &

    Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 4Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 5Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:07:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号