...
首页> 外文期刊>Scanning >An in vitro analysis of separation of multi-use ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next instruments in extracted mandibular molar teeth
【24h】

An in vitro analysis of separation of multi-use ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next instruments in extracted mandibular molar teeth

机译:下颌磨牙中多次使用ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next器械分离的体外分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study investigated the separation incidence of reused ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments and identified the location of separated fragments. The root canals of extracted human mandibular molars were prepared with 10 assorted sets of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next instruments. After each preparation, instrument sets were autoclaved. This arrangement was repeated until an instrument fractured. The number of prepared teeth until fracture occurred was recorded for each instrument set. Teeth in which the instruments fractured were analyzed to determine the separation grade, apical relation, and coronal position. Fracture surfaces of the instruments were examined with scanning electron microscope. ProTaper Universal instruments fractured after application to a mean of 7.3 teeth, and ProTaper Next instruments after application to a mean of 5.7 teeth (p>0.05). In the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next groups, F2 and X1 were the most commonly fractured instruments, respectively. Torsional and cyclic failures were evenly distributed in both the groups. The mean lengths of the fractured fragments of the instruments showed no statistically significant difference. The distance between the tip of the fractured instruments and apical constriction was similar (p>0.05). However, the mean distance between the root canal orifice and coronal part of the fractured instrument was shorter in the ProTaper Next group (p<0.05). The life span of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next instruments was the same for preparation of mandibular molar teeth. None of the instruments were fractured in the first usage. SCANNING 37:270-276, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:这项研究调查了重复使用的ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next旋转仪器的分离率,并确定了分离片段的位置。用10套ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next器械准备提取的人类下颌臼齿的根管。每次准备后,将仪器高压灭菌。重复这种布置直到仪器破裂。记录每个器械组直到断裂发生之前准备好的牙齿的数量。分析了器械破裂的牙齿,以确定分离程度,根尖关系和冠状位置。用扫描电子显微镜检查仪器的断裂表面。 ProTaper Universal器械平均施加7.3颗牙齿后断裂,而ProTaper Next器械施加平均5.7颗牙齿后断裂(p> 0.05)。在ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next组中,F2和X1分别是最常见的断裂器械。扭转和循环破坏在两组中平均分布。器械断裂片段的平均长度没有统计学上的显着差异。骨折器械尖端与根尖收缩部之间的距离相似(p> 0.05)。但是,ProTaper Next组的根管口与骨折器械冠状部分之间的平均距离较短(p <0.05)。 ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next仪器的使用寿命与下颌磨牙的制备相同。第一次使用时,没有一个乐器断裂。扫描37:270-276,2015.(c)2015 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scanning》 |2015年第4期|270-276|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Izmir, Turkey;

    Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Izmir, Turkey;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    fracture; dentistry; SEM; image analysis;

    机译:断裂;牙科;SEM;图像分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号