首页> 外文期刊>SC magazine >The fallacy of targeted attacks
【24h】

The fallacy of targeted attacks

机译:定向攻击的谬误

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last few months, I've had the opportunity to visit, meet and hold extensive discussions with a variety of people across the security landscape. In the process, I've realized there is a great level of misconception around the detection or even prevention of targeted attacks and advanced threats. First of all, prevention is simply not possible. If that problem were solvable, academia and industry would have solved it many years ago, and other types of threat detection companies simply wouldn't exist. The attacker has the first move, thus the infection vector is bounded by the attacker's skill sets. Now, let's try to demystify the problems of detecting advanced and targeted threats and discuss to what extent we can rely on sandboxing-based technologies to solve the problems for our organizations.
机译:在过去的几个月中,我有幸与安全领域的各种人员进行了访问,见面并进行了广泛的讨论。在此过程中,我意识到在检测甚至预防定向攻击和高级威胁方面存在很大的误解。首先,根本不可能预防。如果这个问题可以解决,那么学术界和工业界将在很多年前解决它,其他类型的威胁检测公司也将不复存在。攻击者先采取行动,因此感染媒介受到攻击者技能的限制。现在,让我们尝试使检测高级威胁和定向威胁的问题神秘化,并讨论我们可以在多大程度上依靠基于沙箱的技术来为我们的组织解决问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《SC magazine》 |2014年第3期|18-18|共1页
  • 作者

    Manos Antonakakis;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号