首页> 外文期刊>Road & Transport Research >Pedal cycle injuries in NSW: A comparison of data sources
【24h】

Pedal cycle injuries in NSW: A comparison of data sources

机译:新南威尔士州的脚踏车伤:数据来源的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In NSW, police data are used as the basis for Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) accident and injury statistics (after filtering and removal of inconsistencies). These RTA data are the primary data on which decisions regarding motor vehicle and traffic injury prevention policies and programs are based. For a variety of reasons, the RTA injury data are not consistent with comparable motor vehicle accident data from the NSW hospital Inpatient Statistics Collection (ISC). To understand the degree of inconsistency between the RTA aria ISC databases and policy implications, we analysed injury data for 1999-2000 for pedal cycle and motor vehicle accidents, applying the same filters. We found that the RTA data consistently over-represented the number of injuries for motor vehicle drivers and passengers, and underestimated the injuries for pedal cycles when compared with hospital data. This finding suggests that the RTA is likely to focus more injury-prevention resources on motor vehicle crashes, and pedal cycle injury prevention is likely to receive fewer resources than is warranted.
机译:在新南威尔士州,警察数据被用作道路和交通管理局(RTA)事故和伤害统计的基础(经过过滤和消除不一致后)。这些RTA数据是有关机动车和交通伤害预防政策和计划的决策所依据的主要数据。由于各种原因,RTA伤害数据与来自新南威尔士州医院住院统计数据收集中心(ISC)的可比较的机动车事故数据不一致。为了了解RTA aria ISC数据库与政策含义之间的不一致程度,我们使用相同的过滤器分析了1999-2000年踏板周期和机动车事故的伤害数据。我们发现,RTA数据始终高估了机动车驾驶员和乘客的受伤次数,与医院数据相比,低估了脚踏车的受伤次数。这一发现表明,RTA可能会将更多的伤害预防资源集中在机动车碰撞上,而防止踏板骑行伤害可能会收到少于保证的资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号