首页> 外文期刊>Risk analysis >A Comparison Between Probabilistic and Dempster-Shafer Theory Approaches to Model Uncertainty Analysis in the Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories
【24h】

A Comparison Between Probabilistic and Dempster-Shafer Theory Approaches to Model Uncertainty Analysis in the Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories

机译:放射性废物处置库性能评估中不确定性分析的概率论和Dempster-Shafer理论方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Model uncertainty is a primary source of uncertainty in the assessment of the performance of repositories for the disposal of nuclear wastes, due to the complexity of the system and the large spatial and temporal scales involved. This work considers multiple assumptions on the system behavior and corresponding alternative plausible modeling hypotheses. To characterize the uncertainty in the correctness of the different hypotheses, the opinions of different experts are treated probabilistically or, in alternative, by the belief and plausibility functions of the Dempster-Shafer theory. A comparison is made with reference to a flow model for the evaluation of the hydraulic head distributions present at a radioactive waste repository site. Three experts are assumed available for the evaluation of the uncertainties associated with the hydrogeological properties of the repository and the groundwater flow mechanisms.
机译:由于系统的复杂性以及所涉及的时空规模较大,模型不确定性是评估处置核废料储存库性能的不确定性的主要来源。这项工作考虑了关于系统行为的多种假设以及相应的替代合理建模假设。为了表征不同假设的正确性的不确定性,可以概率论地对待不同专家的意见,或者通过Dempster-Shafer理论的信念和合理性函数来对待。参照流动模型进行比较,以评估放射性废物处置库现场的水力压头分布。假定可利用三名专家来评估与该库的水文地质特性和地下水流机制有关的不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号