首页> 外文期刊>Reviews on environmental health >A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation
【24h】

A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation

机译:非电离辐射生物效应的新型数据库

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A significant amount of electromagnetic field/electromagnetic radiation (EMF/EMR) research is available that examines biological and disease associated endpoints. The quantity, variety and changing parameters in the available research can be challenging when undertaking a literature review, meta-analysis, preparing a study design, building reference lists or comparing findings between relevant scientific papers. The Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA) has created a comprehensive, non-biased, multi-categorized, searchable database of papers on non-ionizing EMF/EMR to help address these challenges. It is regularly added to, freely accessible online and designed to allow data to be easily retrieved, sorted and analyzed. This paper demonstrates the content and search flexibility of the ORSAA database. Demonstration searches are presented by Effect/No Effect; frequency-band/s; in vitro; in vivo; biological effects; study type; and funding source. As of the 15th September 2017, the clear majority of 2653 papers captured in the database examine outcomes in the 300 MHz-3 GHz range. There are 3 times more biological "Effect" than "No Effect" papers; nearly a third of papers provide no funding statement; industry-funded studies more often than not find "No Effect", while institutional funding commonly reveal "Effects". Country of origin where the study is conducted/funded also appears to have a dramatic influence on the likely result outcome.
机译:大量的电磁场/电磁辐射(EMF / EMR)研究可用于检查与生物学和疾病相关的终点。在进行文献综述,荟萃分析,准备研究设计,建立参考文献清单或比较相关科学论文的发现时,现有研究中的数量,品种和变化的参数可能会面临挑战。大洋洲无线电频率科学咨询协会(ORSAA)建立了一个全面的,无偏见的,多分类的,可搜索的非电离EMF / EMR论文数据库,以帮助应对这些挑战。它定期添加到网上,可免费访问,并且旨在使数据易于检索,分类和分析。本文演示了ORSAA数据库的内容和搜索灵活性。示范搜索以“效果/无效果”表示;频段/秒;体外;体内;生物效应;学习类型;和资金来源。截至2017年9月15日,数据库中捕获的2653篇论文中绝大部分都检查了300 MHz-3 GHz范围内的结果。生物“效果”比“无效果”论文多3倍;近三分之一的论文没有提供资金说明;由行业资助的研究常常没有发现“没有效果”,而机构资助通常显示出“效果”。进行/资助研究的原籍国似乎也对可能的结果产生重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号