...
首页> 外文期刊>Review of quantitative finance and accounting >The impact of multi-dimensional corporate transparency on us firms' credit ratings and cost of capital
【24h】

The impact of multi-dimensional corporate transparency on us firms' credit ratings and cost of capital

机译:多维公司透明度对美国公司的信用等级和资本成本的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study examines corporate transparency in the US market for a sample of 319 S&P 500 firms. We examine whether a number of disparate measures of corporate transparency used by other researchers are distinct, cohere as measures of a single factor of corporate transparency, or capture multiple different dimensions. Next, we begin to examine the impact of corporate transparency, conceived in the broadest sense, and not limited to financial reporting, on US firms. We develop a model of corporate transparency based on a broad definition and framework proposed by Bushman, Piotrowski and Smith, which we extend in several ways, and then study the effect of corporate transparency on cost of debt, credit rating, and cost of equity. First, we find that corporate transparency is neither a unitary concept nor merely an ambiguous term for multiple distinct concepts: factor analysis of ten corporate transparency variables identifies four independent underlying dimensions: public disclosure information, intermediary information, earnings quality information and insider information. Second, we find that corporate transparency has significant power to explain cross-sectional variation in credit rating and cost of capital. More specifically, (i) credit rating, cost of debt, and beta are significantly associated with disclosure information transparency; (ii) credit rating, cost of equity, and beta are significantly associated with intermediary information transparency; and (iii) cost of equity and beta are significantly associated with insider information transparency. Our findings offer a more comprehensive evaluation of corporate transparency than prior studies, and we demonstrate direct economic implications for both US firms and markets.
机译:这项研究从319家标准普尔500强公司的样本中考察了美国市场的公司透明度。我们研究了其他研究人员使用的许多不同的公司透明度衡量标准是否不同,是作为单个公司透明度因素衡量的,还是涵盖了多个不同维度。接下来,我们开始研究从最广义的角度出发(但不仅限于财务报告)的公司透明度对美国公司的影响。我们根据布什曼,皮奥特洛夫斯基和史密斯提出的广泛定义和框架,开发了公司透明度模型,并以几种方式对其进行了扩展,然后研究了公司透明度对债务成本,信用评级和权益成本的影响。首先,我们发现公司透明度既不是一个统一的概念,也不是多个不同概念的模棱两可的术语:对十个公司透明度变量的因素分析确定了四个独立的基础维度:公开信息,中介信息,收入质量信息和内部信息。其次,我们发现公司透明性可以有效解释信用评级和资本成本的横截面变化。更具体地说,(i)信用等级,债务成本和beta与披露信息的透明度显着相关; (ii)信用等级,权益成本和beta与中介信息的透明度密切相关; (iii)股本成本和beta成本与内部人信息透明度密切相关。我们的发现提供了比以前的研究更全面的公司透明度评估,并且我们证明了对美国公司和市场的直接经济影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号