首页> 外文期刊>Review of Managerial Science >Are diamonds a safe haven?
【24h】

Are diamonds a safe haven?

机译:钻石是避风港吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The diamond market has recently experienced important structural changes moving from a monopolistic market to a more liberalised and competitive one. As a result, diamonds are being discussed as a new investment asset class, with possible valuable portfolio contributions. The aim of this paper is to analyse their potential role within an investment framework, using previously unpublished data. We use the GemShares and NASDAQ OMX patented license and Polished Prices proprietary Price Reporting Agency (PRA) database to build our own standardized financial polished diamond basket indices (DBIs), using actual reported data of traded prices, adjusted for liquidity by traded volume. The impact of adjusting for traded volume of investment grade (only) diamonds is sufficient to develop a unique subset different to that captured and reported by the PRA. We first construct an index for High-Quality (HQ) and a second one for Medium-Quality (MQ) diamonds so we can study both of their dynamics and investment features. We further analyse the relationship the two indices have with major macroeconomic and financial variables, as well as other precious commodities to investigate their role as safe haven or hedge. We find that the DBI~(HQ)Index returns are, on average, positively correlated with major macroeconomic variables—in particular with the Euro and Chinese Interest rates. The DBI~(MQ)Index returns are largely uncorrelated with the same macroeconomic variables—with the exception of Euro Interest rates and the Israeli Exchange rate. When we compare our Diamond Indices returns with major financial variables and other precious commodities, we find a broad lack of correlation between their returns, and significant difference between the DBI~(HQ)and DBI~(MQ)Indices. We may conclude that diamonds are broadly a poor hedge for any of the portfolios we considered, with a few important exceptions—especially gold. Using Bauer and Lucey’s (Financ Rev 45(2):217–229. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.952289 , 2010) approach we further tested the “safe haven value” and “hedging usefulness” of the two Indices. In contrast with previous studies we believe the unique data we accessed allowed us to demonstrate that diamonds represent a strong hedge for gold investors, and in addition exhibit features of a safe haven for stock markets during periods of financial stress.
机译:钻石市场最近经历了重要的结构变化,从垄断市场转变为更加自由化和更具竞争力的市场。因此,钻石正在被视为一种新的投资资产类别,可能具有有价值的投资组合贡献。本文的目的是使用以前未发布的数据来分析它们在投资框架中的潜在作用。我们使用GemShares和NASDAQ OMX的专利许可以及抛光价格专有的价格报告机构(PRA)数据库,使用交易价格的实际报告数据(根据交易量对流动性进行调整)来构建自己的标准化财务钻石篮子指数(DBI)。调整投资级(仅)钻石交易量的影响足以形成与PRA捕获和报告的钻石不同的独特子集。我们首先为高质量(HQ)构建索引,然后为中等质量(MQ)钻石构建索引,以便我们可以研究它们的动态和投资特征。我们进一步分析了这两个指数与主要的宏观经济和金融变量以及其他贵重商品之间的关系,以研究其作为避险或避险的作用。我们发现,DBI〜(HQ)指数的回报平均与主要的宏观经济变量(尤其是与欧元和中国的利率)呈正相关。除欧元利率和以色列汇率外,DBI〜(MQ)指数的回报率与相同的宏观经济变量基本无关。当我们将钻石指数收益与主要金融变量和其他贵重商品进行比较时,我们发现它们的收益之间缺乏广泛的相关性,而DBI〜(HQ)与DBI〜(MQ)指数之间存在显着差异。我们可能得出的结论是,对于我们考虑的任何投资组合而言,钻石总体上都是较差的套期保值,但有几个重要的例外,尤其是黄金。使用Bauer和Lucey(Financ Rev 45(2):217–229。doi:10.2139 / ssrn.952289,2010)的方法,我们进一步测试了两个指数的“避险资产价值”和“对冲有用性”。与以前的研究相比,我们认为我们获得的独特数据使我们能够证明钻石对黄金投资者而言是强大的避险工具,此外,在财务压力时期,它还具有为股市提供避风港的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号