首页> 外文期刊>Review of Financial Economics >Does sovereign risk matter? New evidence from eurozone corporate bond ratings and zero-volatility spreads
【24h】

Does sovereign risk matter? New evidence from eurozone corporate bond ratings and zero-volatility spreads

机译:主权风险重要吗?欧元区公司债券评级和零波动价差的新证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we empirically examine if sovereign risk matters for corporate bonds in developed economies. Using a unique panel data sample of 897 corporate bonds from eleven countries within the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), we investigate sovereign and corporate ratings as well as zero-volatility spreads (z-spreads). In the time period from March 2006 to June 2012, we find sovereign risk to be a significant driver of corporate risk. The effect is stronger for companies with domestic revenue structure, for companies that are (partly) owned by the government, and companies active in the utility and transportation sector. Interestingly, the impact of sovereign risk on corporate risk during the acute European sovereign debt crisis period decreases if ratings are examined, but increases if z-spreads are utilized. Rating agencies seem to take a more differentiated view on individual company risk during the sovereign debt crisis, while institutional investors might want to reduce their exposure to a country in financial distress as a whole, regardless of whether sovereign or corporate bonds are held.
机译:在本文中,我们根据经验检验了主权风险是否对发达经济体的公司债券至关重要。我们使用来自经济和货币联盟(EMU)内11个国家的897家公司债券的独特面板数据样本,研究了主权和公司评级以及零波动点差(z-spreads)。从2006年3月到2012年6月,我们发现主权风险是公司风险的重要驱动因素。对于具有国内收入结构的公司,(部分)归政府所有的公司以及活跃于公用事业和运输业的公司而言,这种影响更为明显。有趣的是,如果评估评级,在急性欧洲主权债务危机期间主权风险对公司风险的影响会降低,但如果使用Z利差,则会增加。在主权债务危机期间,评级机构似乎对个别公司的风险持更为不同的看法,而机构投资者可能希望减少整体上陷入财务困境的国家的风险,而不论持有主权债券还是公司债券。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号