首页> 外文期刊>Review of environmental economics and policy >Leaving an Emissions Trading Scheme: Implications for the United Kingdom and the European Union
【24h】

Leaving an Emissions Trading Scheme: Implications for the United Kingdom and the European Union

机译:退出排放权交易计划:对英国和欧盟的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The United Kingdom (UK) may opt to leave the European Union (EU) emissions trading system (ETS) for greenhouse gases. This policy brief examines the implications. The UK is a large importer of emission permits. Thus, meeting its climate policy targets would be much more difficult without the EU ETS, costing an additional 0.2 to 0.4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). In addition to the increased compliance costs, the UK will face transition costs for leaving the EU ETS because a central plank of UK climate policy (i.e., permit trade) will need to be replaced on short notice. Furthermore, there may be a loss of business as the carbon trade leaves London. Moreover, as UK greenhouse gas regulation diverges from the EU, distortions at the border will also increase. The impact of a UK departure from the EU ETS on the EU would be limited if the EU accepts a weaker emissions cap. Non-EU countries such as Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein participate in the EU ETS, and this would appear to be the best option for the UK if it leaves the EU.
机译:英国(UK)可能会选择离开欧盟(EU)排放交易系统(ETS)来处理温室气体。本政策简介探讨了其含义。英国是排放许可证的主要进口国。因此,如果没有欧盟排放交易体系,要实现其气候政策目标将更加困难,因为这需要付出额外0.2%至0.4%的国内生产总值(GDP)。除了增加合规成本外,英国还将面临离开欧盟ETS的过渡成本,因为英国的气候政策(即许可贸易)的核心内容将需要在短时间内更换。此外,随着碳交易离开伦敦,业务可能会亏损。此外,随着英国温室气体法规与欧盟的分歧,边境的扭曲也将加剧。如果欧盟接受较弱的排放上限,那么英国退出欧盟ETS对欧盟的影响将是有限的。非欧盟国家(例如挪威,冰岛和列支敦士登)参加了欧盟排放交易体系,如果英国离开欧盟,这似乎是英国的最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号