首页> 外文期刊>Review of Economics and Statistics >ARE INTERNATIONAL R&D SPILLOVERS COSTLY FOR THE UNITED STATES?
【24h】

ARE INTERNATIONAL R&D SPILLOVERS COSTLY FOR THE UNITED STATES?

机译:国际研发溢出对美国而言是否成本高昂?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Coe and Helpman, among others, report positive and equivalent R&D spillovers across groups of countries. However, the nature of their econometric tests does not address the heterogeneity of knowledge diffusion across countries. We empirically examine these issues in a sample of 10 OECD countries by extending both the time span and the coverage of R&D activities in the data set. We find that the elasticity of total factor productivity with respect to domestic and foreign R&D stocks is extremely heterogeneous across countries and that data cannot be pooled. Thus, panel estimates conceal important cross-country differences. The United States appears to be a net loser in international R&D spillovers. Our interpretation is that when competitors catch up technologically, they challenge U.S. market shares and investments worldwide. This has implications for U.S. productivity.
机译:Coe和Helpman等报告了各个国家/地区在研发方面的积极和同等的溢出效应。但是,计量经济学测试的性质并未解决各国之间知识传播的异质性。我们通过扩展数据集中的时间跨度和研发活动的覆盖面,从10个经合组织国家的样本中对这些问题进行了实证研究。我们发现,关于国内和国外R&D存量的全要素生产率弹性在不同国家之间极为不同,并且无法汇总数据。因此,小组估计数掩盖了重要的跨国差异。美国似乎是国际研发溢出的净输家。我们的解释是,当竞争对手在技术上追赶时,他们就会挑战美国在全球的市场份额和投资。这对美国的生产率有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号