【24h】

PROBABILITY DOMINANCE

机译:概率优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The most commonly employed paradigms for decision making under risk are expected utility, prospect theory, and regret theory. We examine the simple heuristic of maximizing the probability of being ahead, which in some natural economic situations may be in contradiction to all three of the above fundamental paradigms. We test whether this heuristic, which we call probability dominance (PD), affects decisions under risk. We set up head-to-head situations where all preferences of a given class (expected utility, original or cumulative prospect theory, or regret theory) favor one alternative yet PD favors the other. Our experiments reveal that 49% of subjects' choices are aligned with PD in contradiction to any form of expected utility or prospect theory maximization; 73% are aligned with PD as opposed to preferences under risk aversion and under original and cumulative prospect theory preferences; and 68% to 76% are aligned with PD contradicting preferences under regret theory. We conclude that probability dominance substantially affects choices and should therefore be incorporated into decision-making models. We show that PD has significant economic consequences. The PD heuristic may have evolved through situations of winner-take-all competition.
机译:在风险下决策的最常用的范式是预期的效用,前景理论和后悔理论。我们研究了最大化未来的概率的简单启发式,这在一些自然的经济形势中可能与上述三个基本范式矛盾矛盾。我们测试这种我们称之为概率优势(PD)的启发式,影响风险下的决策。我们设置了头到头部情况,其中给定的班级的所有偏好(预期的效用,原始或累积的前景理论或遗憾的理论)赞成一个替代的尚未涉及另一个。我们的实验表明,49%的受试者的选择与PD对齐,与任何形式的预期效用或前景理论最大化; 73%与PD对齐,而不是在风险厌恶和原始和累积前景理论偏好下的偏好;和68%至76%与遗憾理论下的PD与PD相对一致。我们得出结论,概率优势基本上影响了选择,因此应将其纳入决策模型。我们表明PD具有显着的经济后果。 PD启发式可能通过赢家的竞争的情况而发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号