...
首页> 外文期刊>Rethinking Marxism >You Can't Anticipate Explosions: Jacques Rancire in Conversation with Chto Delat
【24h】

You Can't Anticipate Explosions: Jacques Rancire in Conversation with Chto Delat

机译:您无法预期爆炸:雅克·兰切尔(Jacques Rancire)与Chto Delat的对话

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Jacques Rancire and members of the group Chto Delat (St. Petersburg/Moscow)—Artemy Magun, Dmitry Vilensky, and Alexandr Skidan—discuss the pertinence of the concept of the avant-garde to the history of art and the present day. Chto Delat members defend the thesis of an essential link between art's political message and its formal features, such as a general “negativity” in relation to the classical canon. They also suggest a distinction between modernism and the avant-garde based on differences in the relation of art to life. Rancire argues against this thesis, returning in detail to the history of art in the twentieth century. He suggests that avant-gardism was a specific, strategic understanding of art that aimed to transform life. The art of the twentieth century was much broader than the avant-garde movement, including a more abstract, minimalist movement as well as an attempt to be faithful to the new forms of modern life. Generally, Rancire insists on his aesthetic theory, according to which the political role of art consists in providing an open and autonomous sensorium for all members of society, allowing them to transform their ways of feeling and acting; it dates not from avant-gardism but from the late eighteenth to early nineteenth centuries. The directly political understanding of art, for him, comes too close to the outdated “ethical regime of art.”
机译:雅克·兰切尔(Jacques Rancire)和Chto Delat(圣彼得堡/莫斯科)小组成员Artemy Magun,Dmitry Vilensky和Alexandr Skidan讨论了前卫概念与艺术史和当今时代的相关性。 Chto Delat成员辩护说,艺术的政治信息与其形式特征之间存在着必不可少的联系,例如与古典经典有关的一般“消极”。他们还基于艺术与生活之间的关系差异,提出了现代主义与前卫艺术之间的区别。 Rancire反对这一论点,详细介绍了20世纪的艺术史。他认为前卫主义是对旨在改变生活的艺术的一种特殊的战略理解。二十世纪的艺术比前卫运动要广泛得多,包括更抽象,极简主义的运动以及对现代生活新形式的忠实尝试。一般来说,兰奇坚持他的美学理论,艺术的政治作用在于为社会所有成员提供一个开放和自主的感官空间,使他们能够改变自己的感觉和行为方式。它不是起源于前卫主义,而是始于18世纪末至19世纪初。对他而言,对艺术的直接政治理解与过时的“艺术伦理制度”过于接近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号