首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Yellow Bush Lupine Invasion in Northern California Coastal Dunes I. Ecological Impacts and Manual Restoration Techniques
【24h】

Yellow Bush Lupine Invasion in Northern California Coastal Dunes I. Ecological Impacts and Manual Restoration Techniques

机译:北加州沿海沙丘的黄布什羽扇豆入侵I.生态影响和人工修复技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We studied the ecological effects of the invasion of coastal dunes by Lupinus arboreus (yellow bush lupine), an introduced species, and used the results to develop manual restoration techniques on the North Spit of Humboldt Bay. Vegetation and soil data were collected in five vegetation types representing points along a continuum of bush lupine's invasive influence. We collected data on the number and size of shrubs, vegetation cover, and soil nutrients. One set of plots was subjected to two restoration treatments: removal of lupine shrubs only, or removal of all nonnative vegetation and removal of litter and duff. Treatments were repeated annually for four years, and emerging lupine seedlings were monitored for three years. Prior to treatment, ammonium and nitrate were found to increase along the lupine continuum, but organic matter decreased at the extreme lupine end. Yellow bush lupine was not the most significant variable affecting variation in soil nutrients. After four years, nonnative grasses, including Vulpia bromoides, Holcus lanatus (velvet grass), Bromus spp. (brome), and Aira spp. (European hairgrass), were significantly reduced in those restoration plots from which litter and duff was removed. Native species increased significantly in vegetation types that were less influenced by lupine. By the third year, soil variables differed among vegetation types but not by treatment. Bush lupine seedling emergence was higher, however, in plots receiving the litter and duff removal treatment. Based on these results, we conclude that bush lupine invasion results in both direct soil enrichment and indirect enrichment as a result of the associated encroachment of other nonnative species, particularly grasses. Although treatment did not affect soil nutrients during the period of this study, it did reduce establishment of nonnative grasses and recruitment of new bush lupine seedlings. Restoration should therefore include litter and duff removal. In areas that are heavily influenced by lupine and contain few native propagules, revegetation is also required.
机译:我们研究了引进种物种羽扇豆(Lupinus arboreus)(黄灌木羽扇豆)入侵沿海沙丘的生态影响,并利用结果开发了洪堡湾北口人工修复技术。收集了五种植被类型的植被和土壤数据,这些植被类型代表了羽扇豆羽扇豆入侵影响的连续性。我们收集了有关灌木,植被覆盖和土壤养分的数量和大小的数据。一组地块接受了两种恢复处理:仅去除羽扇豆灌木,或去除所有非本地植被以及去除垃圾和粉屑。每年重复处理四年,并监测羽扇豆幼苗三年。在治疗之前,发现氨和硝酸盐沿羽扇豆连续体增加,但有机质在羽扇豆的最末端减少。黄灌木羽扇豆不是影响土壤养分变化的最显着变量。四年后,出现了非原生草,包括溴V,草绒(Holcus lanatus),布鲁木(Bromus spp)。 (brome)和Aira spp。 (欧洲毛草)在那些去除了猫砂和粉屑的恢复土地上显着减少了。受羽扇豆影响较小的植被类型中的本地物种显着增加。到第三年,土壤变量因植被类型而异,但不随处理方法而变。但是,在接受垫料和去屑处理的地块中,布什羽扇豆的幼苗出苗率更高。根据这些结果,我们得出结论,由于其他非本地物种(尤其是草类)的入侵,布什羽扇豆的入侵导致直接的土壤富集和间接的富集。尽管在本研究期间处理不影响土壤养分,但确实减少了非本地草的建立和新灌木羽扇豆幼苗的募集。因此,恢复工作应包括清除猫砂和粉屑。在受羽扇豆严重影响且几乎没有原生繁殖体的地区,也需要重新植被。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Restoration ecology》 |1998年第1期|59-68|共10页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号