首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Spoil Heaps From Brown Coal Mining: Technical Reclamation Versus Spontaneous Revegetation
【24h】

Spoil Heaps From Brown Coal Mining: Technical Reclamation Versus Spontaneous Revegetation

机译:褐煤开采的弃渣堆:技术改造与自发植被

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Vegetation samples from either spontaneously re vegetated or technically reclaimed spoil heaps of different ages in one of the largest active brown coal mining districts in Europe were analyzed and compared. The spoil heaps are located in the northwestern part of the Czech Republic and represent ages between 0 and 45 years. Ordination analysis (detrended correspondence analysis) showed that vegetation on technically reclaimed spoil heaps developed in a different way than that on spontaneously revegetated ones. The latter exhibited much higher species diversity in the oldest stages with the number of species doubled that of technically reclaimed sites. The oldest stages were also more advanced along an expected successional gradient as indicated by the ordination. Accelerating the vegetation development by technical reclamation was only of temporal character, whereas spontaneous succession proceeded further over the longer time scale. Spontaneous succession is advocated as an inexpensive and easy alternative to technical reclamation, because it leads to a more natural and rich vegetation cover. Unfortunately, technical reclamation is still the only approach considered in the present reclamation activities for this region.
机译:分析和比较了欧洲最大的活跃褐煤开采区之一中不同年龄的自发植被或经过技术回收的弃渣堆的植被样本。弃渣堆位于捷克共和国的西北部,年龄介于0至45岁之间。排序分析(趋势对应分析)显示,技术回收的弃土堆上的植被与自发植被的植被不同。后者在最古老的阶段表现出更高的物种多样性,其物种数量是技术开垦地点的两倍。按照协调指示,最古老的阶段也沿预期的连续梯度前进。通过技术开垦来加速植被发育只是暂时的,而自发演替则在更长的时间范围内进一步发展。提倡自发演替是技术开垦的一种廉价且简便的替代方法,因为它可以带来更自然,更丰富的植被。不幸的是,技术性复垦仍然是该地区目前的复垦活动中考虑的唯一方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号