...
首页> 外文期刊>Response >Negative Option Marketing Faces New Legal Challenges
【24h】

Negative Option Marketing Faces New Legal Challenges

机译:负期权营销面临新的法律挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Just as marketers have begun to adjust to the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) rigorous and expansive enforcement of the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA), new efforts to regulate negative option marketing techniques have emerged that would impose even more burdensome requirements on these techniques. Last month, a new bill was introduced in Congress - the "Unsubscribe Act of 2017" - which is designed to provide "increased consumer protection with respect to negative option agreements." The bill contains several provisions that would be challenging for marketers to comply with. While ROSCA already requires that there be a "simple" method of cancellation, this bill goes further, requiring - for all online negative option transactions - that the consumer be allowed to cancel "by the same means and in the same manner" as the consumer entered into the transaction.
机译:正如营销人员已开始适应联邦贸易委员会(FTC)对《恢复在线购物者的信任法案》(ROSCA)的严格而广泛的执行一样,出现了新的监管负向选项营销技术的工作,这将对这些产品施加更加繁重的要求技术。上个月,国会通过了一项新法案,即“ 2017年退订法案”,旨在“就消极期权协议提供增强的消费者保护”。该法案包含几项条款,这些条款对于营销人员而言将是挑战。尽管ROSCA已经要求采用一种“简单”的取消方法,但该帐单更进一步,要求-对于所有在线负期权交易-允许消费者以与消费者“相同的方式,相同的方式”取消消费者进行了交易。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Response》 |2017年第7期|56-56|共1页
  • 作者

    Linda A. Goldstein;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号