...
首页> 外文期刊>Resource recycling >IN MY OPINION: UNLOCKING THE FUTURE OF REPAIR
【24h】

IN MY OPINION: UNLOCKING THE FUTURE OF REPAIR

机译:我的看法:修复的未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In 2012, the Librarian of Congress (LoC) made a bad decision. James Hadley Billington ruled that consumers weren't allowed to unlock their own cellphones without their carriers' permission. Usually, the LoC's decisions don't make the headlines. After all, that office rules on intellectual property - a topic that doesn't exactly whip the general public into a fervor. But this time was different. When the LoC made cellphone unlocking illegal, he kicked off a nationwide debate about who controls the life (and the afterlife) of a cellphone - a debate that pitted manufacturers and carriers against consumers and recyclers. Most cellphones sold in the U.S. come digitally "locked" to one specific carrier, like AT&T or Verizon. If you have an AT&T phone, you have to keep using it on AT&T - even after you satisfy the terms of your contract. "Unlocking" lets the owner pick those digital locks, tweak the software and move that phone to another carrier. Devices are, not surprisingly, worth more without these locks, so most recyclers unlock phones for resale overseas. Or at least, they used to.
机译:2012年,美国国会图书馆馆长(LoC)做出了错误的决定。詹姆斯·哈德利·比灵顿(James Hadley Billington)裁定,未经运营商允许,不允许消费者解锁自己的手机。通常,LOC的决定不会成为头条新闻。毕竟,该办公室在知识产权方面占统治地位-这个话题并不能完全激发公众的热情。但是这次不同了。当LoC将手机解锁设为非法时,他发起了一场关于谁控制手机生命(及来世)的全国性辩论,这场辩论使制造商和运营商反对消费者和回收商。在美国销售的大多数手机都以数字方式“锁定”到一个特定的运营商,例如AT&T或Verizon。如果您有AT&T电话,则即使您满足合同条款,也必须继续在AT&T上使用它。 “解锁”使所有者可以选择那些数字锁,调整软件并将该手机移至另一运营商。毫不奇怪,如果没有这些锁,设备的价值会更高,因此大多数回收商会解锁手机以便在海外转售。或者至少,他们曾经如此。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Resource recycling》 |2014年第9期|34-36|共3页
  • 作者

    KYLE WIENS;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号