首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >From creative destruction to creative appropriation: A comprehensive framework
【24h】

From creative destruction to creative appropriation: A comprehensive framework

机译:从创造性的破坏到创造性拨款:全面的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper introduces a conceptual modification of Schumpeter's concept of creative destruction. Identifying a Kuhnian anomaly in a case of creative destruction in the 'new economy', we analyze a case study of the Chinese e-hailing firm DiDi Chuxing to show that this firm used a strategy we term 'creative appropriation', whereby a new firm utilizes incumbent firms' complementary assets but without cooperating with the incumbent, to disrupt a market. This exploitation of complementary assets is based on recombining prevailing technological infra-structure(s) as well as flexible business models that facilitate open innovation. Employing documentary analysis, participant-observation, face-to-face interviews with informants, and a quantitative survey, the study finds that DiDi deployed its e-hailing app to disrupt the taxi market in Xi'an, China (as it did elsewhere in China) as a means of creative destruction, appropriating human-resource-based complementary assets (social and personal reputations, tacit knowledge, and connections) of taxi companies in Xi'an, first to dominate e-hailing in the taxi industry and then to destroy that industry by shifting its focus to private cars.
机译:本文介绍了熊彼特创造性破坏概念的概念修改。在“新经济”中创造性破坏的情况下识别Kuhnian异常,我们分析了对中国电子欢呼公司Didi Chuxing的案例研究表明,这家公司使用了我们学期的战略“创造性拨款”,其中一家新公司利用现任公司的互补资产,但不与现任者合作,扰乱市场。这种对互补资产的开发是基于重组现行技术红外结构以及促进开放创新的灵活商业模式。采用纪录片分析,参与者观察,与信息的面对面访谈以及定量调查,该研究发现,DIDI部署了其电子商用海营应用程序,以扰乱中国西安的出租车市场(就像其他地方一样中国)作为一种创造性毁灭的手段,挪用西安的出租车公司的人力资源的互补资产(社会和个人声誉,默契,知识和联系),首先在出租车行业中占据电子欢呼,然后通过将焦点转移到私家车来摧毁该行业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号