首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction
【24h】

Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction

机译:这次不一样吗?数字化如何影响工作机会的创造和破坏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With the process of digitalization now in full swing, many are wondering how the adoption of new technologies influences job creation and destruction. Much hinges upon the specific tasks that machines take on and how many new tasks are created through the adoption of new digital technologies. Some argue that most tasks that are at risk of automation are those performed by rather low- to medium-skilled employees, while most new tasks that emerge from the adoption of digital technologies complement high-skilled labor. We present evidence derived from representative survey data from Switzerland that is consistent with this view. Specifically, we find that increased investment in digitalization is associated with increased employment of high-skilled workers and reduced employment of low-skilled workers, with a slightly positive net effect. The main effects are almost entirely driven by firms that employ machine-based digital technologies, e.g. robots, 3D printing or the Internet of Things. We do not find any significant employment effects when non-machine-based digital technologies are considered, e.g. ERP, e-commerce or cooperation support systems.
机译:随着数字化进程的全面开展,许多人都想知道新技术的采用如何影响工作机会的创造和破坏。很大程度上取决于机器执行的特定任务以及通过采用新的数字技术可创建多少新任务。一些人认为,大多数具有自动化风险的任务是由中低技能的员工执行的,而采用数字技术带来的大多数新任务是对高技能劳动力的补充。我们提供的证据来自瑞士的代表性调查数据,与该观点一致。具体而言,我们发现,数字化投资的增加与高技能工人的就业增加和低技能工人的就业减少相关,而净效应略有正面。主要影响几乎完全由采用基于机器的数字技术的公司驱动,例如机器人,3D打印或物联网。当考虑使用非基于机器的数字技术时,我们发现没有任何重大的就业影响。 ERP,电子商务或合作支持系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号