首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >The logic of appropriability: From Schumpeter to Arrow to Teece
【24h】

The logic of appropriability: From Schumpeter to Arrow to Teece

机译:合理的逻辑:从熊彼特到阿罗到蒂斯

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This note expounds the abstract fundamentals of the appropriability problem, re-assessing insights from three classic contributions-those of Schumpeter, Arrow and Teece. Whereas the first two contributions were explicitly concerned with the implications of appropriability for society at large, Teece's main concern was with practical questions of business strategy and economic organization. This note argues that, his practical concerns notwithstanding, Teece contributed, en passant but fundamentally, to the clarification of basic questions that previous authors had addressed less comprehensively and less satisfactorily. Specifically, his analysis of the innovator's access to complementary assets, undertaken from a contracting perspective, can be seen as filling a significant gap in the previous theoretical discussion of appropriability. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:本说明阐述了可挪用性问题的抽象基础,并重新评估了三个经典贡献(熊彼特,阿罗和泰斯)的见解。尽管前两个贡献明确涉及可分配性对整个社会的影响,但是Teece的主要关注是商业策略和经济组织的实际问题。本文指出,尽管有实践上的顾虑,但Teece却从根本上为澄清先前作者较不全面,较不令人满意地解决的基本问题做出了贡献。具体而言,他从契约的角度对创新者获得补充资产的途径进行的分析,可以认为填补了先前关于可分配性的理论讨论中的重大空白。 (c)2006年由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号