首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation
【24h】

How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation

机译:社会应为创新者的贪婪加多少?关于专有性,机会和创新率之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The paper attempts a critical assessment of both the theory and the empirical evidence on the role of appropriability and in particular of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) as incentives for technological innovation. We start with a critical discussion of the standard justification of the attribution of IPR in terms of "market failures" in knowledge generation. Such an approach, we argue, misses important features of technological knowledge and also neglects the importance of non-market institutions in the innovation process. Next, we examine the recent changes in the IPR regimes and their influence upon both rates of patenting and underlying rates of innovation. The evidence broadly suggests that, first, IPRs are not the most important device apt to "profit from innovation"; and second, they have at best no impact, or possibly even a negative impact on the underlying rates of innovation. Rather, we argue, technology- and industry-specific patterns of innovation are primarily driven by the opportunities associated with each technological paradigm. Conversely, firm-specific abilities to seize them and "profit from innovation" depend partly on adequacy of the strategic combinations identified by the taxonomy of [Teece, D., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15, 285-305.] and partly on idiosyncratic capabilities embodied in the various firms. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文尝试就可挪用性,特别是知识产权(IPR)作为技术创新激励作用的理论和经验证据进行批判性评估。我们首先从知识创造的“市场失灵”角度对知识产权归因的标准理由进行严格的讨论。我们认为,这种方法错过了技术知识的重要特征,并且忽略了非市场机构在创新过程中的重要性。接下来,我们考察了知识产权制度的最新变化及其对专利率和基础创新率的影响。广泛的证据表明,首先,知识产权并不是最适合“从创新中获利”的重要手段。其次,它们最多对根本的创新速度没有影响,甚至可能没有负面影响。相反,我们认为,特定于技术和行业的创新模式主要是由与每种技术范式相关的机会驱动的。相反,企业特定的抓住它们和“从创新中获利”的能力部分取决于[Teece,D.,1986分类法所确定的战略组合的充分性。技术创新的获利:对集成,协作,许可和公共的影响政策。 [研究政策15,第285-305页],部分涉及各个公司所体现的特有能力。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号