首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Have University Knowledge Flows Narrowed? Evidence From Patent Data
【24h】

Have University Knowledge Flows Narrowed? Evidence From Patent Data

机译:大学知识流是否缩小?来自专利数据的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The rate of university patenting increased dramatically during the 1980s. Did the manner in which knowledge embedded in university patents was managed change during this period of rapid patenting growth? Using a Herfindahl-type measure of knowledge flow concentration and employing a difference-in-differences estimation to compare university-to-firm patent citations across two time periods, we find that the university diffusion premium (the degree to which university knowledge outflows are more widely distributed than those of firms) declined by more than half during the 1980s. In addition, we find that the university diversity premium (the degree to which knowledge inflows used by universities are drawn from a more widely distributed set of prior art holders than those used by firms) also declined by more than half. However, these changes are mostly limited to a narrow set of technology fields (i.e., biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals in the outflows case and sub-fields of electronics in the inflows case). The social welfare implications are ambiguous.
机译:在1980年代,大学获得专利的比率急剧增加。在专利快速增长的这一时期,大学专利中嵌入的知识的管理方式是否发生了变化?使用Herfindahl类型的知识流集中度度量并使用差异差异估计来比较两个时间段内大学对企业的专利引文,我们发现大学扩散溢价(大学知识流失的程度更高)在1980年代下降了一半以上。此外,我们发现大学多样性溢价(大学使用的知识流来自比企业使用的分布范围更广的现有技术持有者的程度)也下降了一半以上。但是,这些变化大多仅限于狭窄的技术领域(例如,在流出情况下为生物技术和制药,在流入情况下为电子子领域)。社会福利含义不明确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号