首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship
【24h】

The emergence of entrepreneurship as an academic field: A personal essay on institutional entrepreneurship

机译:企业家精神作为一个学术领域的出现:关于机构企业家精神的个人论文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The academic field of entrepreneurship research has grown from groups of isolated scholars doing research on small businesses to an international community of departments, institutes, and foundations promoting research on new and high-growth firms. Growth has produced increasingly systematic and interconnected knowledge and growing numbers of knowledge producers and knowledge users share core concepts, principles, and research methods, and a handful of highly cited scholars have emerged as thought leaders within research subfields. The field is increasingly formalized and anchored in a small set of intellectual bases, although there are also some signs of differentiation and fragmentation. Using an institutional theory perspective and drawing upon my experience in the field, 1 explore six forces creating the institutional infrastructure. First, social networking mechanisms have created a social structure facilitating connections between researchers. Second, publication opportunities have increased dramatically. Third, training and mentoring has moved to a collective rather than individual apprenticeship model. Fourth, major foundations and many other smaller funding sources have changed the scale and scope of entrepreneurship research. Fifth, new mechanisms have emerged that recognize and reward individual scholarship, reinforcing the identity of entrepreneurship research as a field and attracting new scholars into it. Sixth, globalizing forces have affected all of these trends. I conclude with some thoughts about the consequences of these developments with regard to the giving of practical and timely advice to entrepreneurs, the effects of American hegemony on choices of research topics and methods, and the possible loss of theoretical eclecticism.
机译:企业家精神研究的学术领域已经从一群对小型企业进行研究的孤立学者,发展成为一个由国际部门,研究所和基金会组成的国际社区,以促进对新兴和高增长公司的研究。增长产生了越来越系统化和相互联系的知识,并且越来越多的知识生产者和知识用户共享核心概念,原理和研究方法,并且少数高被引用的学者已经成为研究子领域中的思想领袖。尽管也有一些分化和支离破碎的迹象,但该领域正日益正规化并以一小部分知识基础为基础。从制度理论的角度出发,并借鉴我在该领域的经验,1探索了六种创建制度基础设施的力量。首先,社交网络机制创建了促进研究者之间联系的社会结构。第二,出版机会急剧增加。第三,培训和指导已转变为集体而不是个人的学徒模式。第四,主要基金会和许多其他较小的资金来源已经改变了创业研究的规模和范围。第五,出现了承认和奖励个人奖学金的新机制,加强了企业家精神研究这一领域的身份并吸引了新学者加入。第六,全球化势力影响了所有这些趋势。最后,我对这些事态发展的后果进行了一些思考,这些后果包括向企业家提供实用,及时的建议,美国霸权主义对研究主题和方法选择的影响以及理论上的折衷主义的丧失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号