首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing
【24h】

Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing

机译:公共服务创新和多种制度逻辑:健康和福祉的混合型社会企业提供者案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public sector organisations are confronted with growing health and social care needs in combination with severe resource constraints, prompting interest in innovative responses to such challenges. Public service innovation is poorly understood, particularly where innovators must navigate between the norms, practices and logics of public, private and civil society sectors. We contribute to the understanding of how innovating hybrid organisations are able to creatively combine co-existing logics. Case study evidence from newly established social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing services in England is utilised to examine how innovations are shaped by (i) an incumbent state or public sector logic, and two ‘challenger’ logics relating to (ii) the market and increasing competition; and (iii) civil society, emphasising social value and democratic engagement with employees and service users. The analysis shows how a more fluid and creative interplay of logics can be observed in relation to specific strategies and practices. Within organisations, these strategies relate to the empowerment of staff to be creative, financial management, and knowledge sharing and protection. The interplay of logics shaping social innovation is also found in relationships with key stakeholders, notably public sector funders, service users and service delivery partners. Implications are drawn for innovation in public services and hybrid organisations more broadly.
机译:公共部门组织面临日益增长的保健和社会护理需求,同时又受到严重的资源限制,这促使人们对以创新的方式应对此类挑战感兴趣。对公共服务创新的了解很少,特别是在创新者必须在公共,私营和民间社会部门的规范,实践和逻辑之间进行导航的地方。我们有助于了解创新的混合组织如何能够创造性地结合现有的逻辑。来自英格兰新成立的健康和福祉服务的社会企业提供者的案例研究证据被用于研究创新是如何形成的(i)现有的国家或公共部门逻辑,以及与(ii)市场和市场相关的两个“挑战性”逻辑。竞争加剧; (iii)公民社会,强调社会价值和与雇员和服务使用者的民主参与。分析显示了如何观察到与特定策略和实践相关的逻辑之间更流畅,更具创造性的相互作用。在组织内部,这些策略涉及赋予员工创造力,财务管理以及知识共享和保护的能力。与主要利益相关者,特别是公共部门出资者,服务用户和服务提供合作伙伴的关系中也发现了塑造社会创新的逻辑之间的相互作用。对于公共服务和混合组织的创新产生了广泛的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2017年第10期|1755-1768|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University Business School, The Burroughs, London, United Kingdom;

    Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University Business School, The Burroughs, London, United Kingdom;

    Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University Business School, The Burroughs, London, United Kingdom;

    School of Government & Society, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Hybrid organisations; Institutional logics; Public service; Social enterprise; Social innovation;

    机译:混合组织;制度逻辑;公共服务;社会企业;社会创新;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号