首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda
【24h】

Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda

机译:多模式标准化:严格的审查和研究议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Standardisation is key to shaping new technologies and supporting major ongoing trends, such as the increased importance of platforms, developing ‘smart’ technologies and innovating large-scale complex systems. Standardisation plays a key role in shaping the rules that govern these developments and their effects on society. Due to the large variety of actors involved in these trends, the associated standardisation processes are likely to involve all three modes of standardisation identified in the literature: committee-based, market-based and government-based. This multi-mode standardisation challenges the theoretical views on standardisation which predominantly focus on one of the modes. In this paper, we review the existing literatures on individual modes and on multi-mode standardisation. By recombining existing evidence, we generate new insights into multi-mode standardisation processes. These first insights relate to the contributions that each mode can make to such processes’ outcomes and suggest that their impact depends on factors, such as their initiation's timing and the institutional context in which the standardisation process occurs. Moreover, we consider the conditions under which actors can launch each mode. Based on our observations, we formulate an agenda for future research to obtain a better understanding of multi-mode standardisation. We offer recommendations for industry actors, NGOs, researchers and policy makers involved in shaping technological and societal change.
机译:标准化对于塑造新技术和支持主要的持续趋势至关重要,例如平台重要性的提高,开发“智能”技术以及创新大规模复杂系统。标准化在制定规范这些发展及其对社会的影响的规则方面起着关键作用。由于参与这些趋势的参与者多种多样,相关的标准化过程可能涉及文献中确定的所有三种标准化模式:基于委员会的,基于市场的和基于政府的。这种多模式标准化挑战了对标准化的理论观点,这些理论观点主要集中在其中一种模式上。在本文中,我们回顾了有关单个模式和多模式标准化的现有文献。通过重新组合现有证据,我们对多模式标准化流程产生了新的见解。这些最初的见解涉及每种模式可以对此类过程的结果做出的贡献,并表明它们的影响取决于各种因素,例如它们启动的时机和标准化过程发生的制度背景。此外,我们考虑了参与者可以启动每种模式的条件。根据我们的观察,我们为将来的研究制定了议程,以更好地了解多模式标准化。我们为参与塑造技术和社会变革的行业参与者,非政府组织,研究人员和决策者提供建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2017年第8期|1370-1386|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Chair of Standardisation, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

    Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Chair of Standardisation, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, Netherlands,Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Section Economics of Technology and Innovation, Jaffalaan 5, Delft, Netherlands;

    Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Innovation Economics, MAR 2-5, Marchstraße 23, Berlin, Germany,Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems, Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31, Berlin, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Committee-based standardization; Government-based standardization; Multi-mode standardization; Regulation; Standard battles; Standardization;

    机译:基于委员会的标准化;基于政府的标准化;多模式标准化;规;标准战斗;标准化;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号