首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >“To Own, or not to Own?” A multilevel analysis of intellectual property right policies' on academic entrepreneurship
【24h】

“To Own, or not to Own?” A multilevel analysis of intellectual property right policies' on academic entrepreneurship

机译:“拥有还是不拥有?”关于学术创业的知识产权政策的多层次分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The political environment around universities has led them to create an infrastructure to manage academic inventions. While some consider that the advantages of a university entrepreneurial structure outweigh any potential negative effects, others question their detrimental effect on academic scientists’ entrepreneurial behavior. However, this debate remains unresolved as none of these two views have been fully empirically supported. Using multilevel models for a population of 2230 professors in 27 universities in Canada (82 individuals per unit on average), we test the effect of three features of institutional intellectual property right policy characteristics, namely, property rights (ownership regime), control rights (obligation to disclose and option to commercialize), and income-sharing schemes (when commercialization involves the university or an individual inventor) on two commercial behaviors of faculty members, namely, formal commercialization (patent and spinoff creation), and informal commercialization (consulting and commercial agreement). Our results suggest that contrary to most of the literature, academic inventors’ behavior is influenced not by the invention ownership regime but by the control rights in place and the sharing of income between the university and the academic inventors. The findings have some implications for the importance of an ownership regime and the ineffectiveness of institutional policies which create contradictory motivations for academic entrepreneurs. It suggests some directions for future research using multilevel models.
机译:大学周围的政治环境促使他们创建了管理学术发明的基础设施。尽管有些人认为大学创业结构的优势胜过任何潜在的负面影响,但其他人则质疑其对学术科学家的创业行为的有害影响。但是,由于这两种观点都没有得到充分的经验支持,因此这一辩论仍未解决。我们使用多层次模型对加拿大27所大学的2230名教授进行了人口分析(平均每单位82个人),我们测试了制度性知识产权政策特征的三个特征,即产权(所有权制度),控制权(有义务公开和选择商业化),以及关于教职员工的两种商业行为的收入分成计划(当商业化涉及大学或个人发明家时),即正式商业化(专利和附带利益创造)和非正式商业化(咨询和商业协议)。我们的研究结果表明,与大多数文献相反,学术发明人的行为不受发明所有权制度的影响,而受现有控制权以及大学与学术发明人之间收入分配的影响。这些发现对所有权制度的重要性和制度性政策的无效性产生了一定的影响,这为学术企业家创造了矛盾的动机。它为使用多层模型的未来研究提供了一些指导。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2017年第8期|1479-1489|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Laval University, 2325 Rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC, Canada;

    Laval University, 2325 Rue de la Terrasse, Québec, QC, Canada;

    University of Valencia, Department of Management, Avda. de los Naranjos s, Valencia, Spain,INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s, Valencia, Spain;

    Thompson Rivers University, 900 McGill Road, Kamloops, BC, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Academic entrepreneurship; Intellectual property rights policies; Multilevel models;

    机译:学术创业精神;知识产权政策;多层模型;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号