首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Towards evidence-based management of external resources: Developing design propositions and future research avenues through research synthesis
【24h】

Towards evidence-based management of external resources: Developing design propositions and future research avenues through research synthesis

机译:进行基于证据的外部资源管理:通过研究综合开发设计方案和未来的研究途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The general question of how best to access and leverage resources that reside outside the boundaries of the focal firm has become increasingly important for companies during the last decennia, and scholars across management disciplines have responded with increasing research efforts. However, managers still seldom base their decisions on scientific evidence. Research on managing external resources is carried out in disciplinary silos and it is extremely difficult for managers to make sense of the vast amount of scientific studies. The success story of medicine as the first domain to widely adopt evidence-based practices has been an exemplar for other disciplines such as management to address the prevailing research-practice gap. Through a systematic review and synthesis of 601 articles in six academic journals representing three management disciplines we develop design propositions for supporting evidence-based management of external resources in firms. Our analysis reveals external resource management (ERM) research to be concentrated on six distinct, yet interrelated, themes. We adopt the CIMO-logic (Context, Intervention, Mechanism, Outcomes) for developing the set of design propositions within each of the research themes. A key scientific contribution is our identification of future research opportunities and directions to advance science in the field of ERM.
机译:在上个十年中,关于如何最好地访问和利用位于焦点公司边界之外的资源的一般问题对于公司而言变得越来越重要,并且各个管理学科的学者都做出了越来越多的研究努力。但是,管理人员仍然很少根据科学证据做出决定。管理外部资源的研究是在学科孤岛中进行的,管理者很难充分理解大量科学研究。医学作为成功广泛采用循证实践的第一个领域的成功故事,已成为管理等其他学科解决当前研究与实践差距的典范。通过对代表三门管理学科的六种学术期刊上的601篇文章进行系统的审查和综合,我们开发了设计命题,以支持对公司外部资源进行循证管理。我们的分析表明,外部资源管理(ERM)研究将集中在六个截然不同但相互关联的主题上。我们采用CIMO逻辑(上下文,干预,机制,结果)来制定每个研究主题中的一组设计主张。一项重要的科学贡献是我们确定未来的研究机会和在ERM领域推进科学的方向。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2017年第6期|1087-1105|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Aalto University School of Science, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, PB 15500, 00076 Aalto, Espoo, Finland;

    Tampere University of Technology, Department of Industrial Management, PB 541, 33010 Tampere, Finland;

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, PB 1000, 02044 VTT, Espoo, Finland;

    Aalto University School of Business, Department of Information and Service Economy, PB 21210, 00076 Aalto, Helsinki, Finland;

    Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Technology Management and Economics, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden;

    Aalto University School of Business, Department of Information and Service Economy, PB 21210, 00076 Aalto, Helsinki, Finland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Evidence-based management; Interdisciplinarity; Research synthesis; Alliances; Supply chains;

    机译:循证管理;跨学科;研究综合;联盟;供应链;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:51:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号