...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in Economics >Arts vs engineering: Choosing consumption of and investment in education
【24h】

Arts vs engineering: Choosing consumption of and investment in education

机译:艺术与工程:选择教育的消费和投资

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We develop a model in which students choose their college coursework based on both investment and consumption incentives. These education decisions are socially inefficient. This result is driven by the fact that students do not consider an externality in the working environment of acquiring education for investment purposes. Regulated tuition fees have more potential to induce socially optimal outcomes than regulating levels of education given information constraints. The model can help explain several empirical regularities in the education literature.
机译:我们建立了一个模型,在该模型中,学生可以基于投资和消费激励措施选择大学课程。这些教育决定在社会上效率低下。这一结果是由以下事实驱动的:学生在投资目的的工作环境中不考虑外部性。与在信息限制下调节教育水平相比,受管制的学费具有更大的潜力诱发社会最佳结果。该模型可以帮助解释教育文献中的一些经验规律。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号