...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in Economics >Counterfactual analysis in macroeconometrics: An empirical investigation into the effects of quantitative easing
【24h】

Counterfactual analysis in macroeconometrics: An empirical investigation into the effects of quantitative easing

机译:宏观计量经济学中的反事实分析:量化宽松效应的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper develops tests of policy ineffectiveness when counterfactual outcomes, namely the predicted values of the target variable in the absence of a policy change, are obtained using reduced form or final form 'policy response equations'. The policy response equation explains the target variable by lags of itself and by current and lagged values of the policy variable and policy-invariant exogenous variables. These tests complement those in Pesaran and Smith (2015), which are done in the context of complete systems of mac-roeconometric dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) under rational expectations (RE). While there would be efficiency gains from using the complete system, were it fully known and correctly specified, this is rarely the case. Instead, since the counterfactual is a type of forecast and parsimonious models tend to forecast better than complex ones, we may obtain more reliable estimates of the counterfactual outcomes from a parsimonious policy response equation. We consider two types of policy intervention, a discretionary policy change where there is a deterministic change to the policy variable, and a rule-based policy change where one or more parameters of a stochastic policy rule are changed. We examine the asymptotic distributions and power of the tests under various assumptions. The proposed test for a discretionary policy change is illustrated with an application to the unconventional monetary policy known as quantitative easing (QE) adopted in the UK.
机译:当反事实结果(即没有政策改变的情况下目标变量的预测值)是使用简化形式或最终形式的“政策响应方程式”获得时,本文研究了政策无效性的测试。策略响应方程式通过目标变量自身的滞后以及策略变量和策略不变外生变量的当前值和滞后值来解释目标变量。这些测试是对Pesaran和Smith(2015)中测试的补充,这些测试是在有理性预期(RE)的完整宏观计量经济动态随机一般均衡(DSGE)系统的背景下完成的。使用完整的系统虽然可以提高效率,但要充分了解并正确指定它却很少。取而代之的是,由于反事实是一种预测,而简约模型的预测往往比复杂模型更好,因此我们可以从简约政策响应方程中获得对事实结果的更可靠估计。我们考虑两种类型的策略干预:一种是对策略变量进行确定性更改的可任意执行的策略更改,另一种是更改随机策略规则的一个或多个参数的基于规则的策略更改。我们在各种假设下检验了测试的渐近分布和功效。英国对通行的非常规货币政策(称为量化宽松(QE))的应用说明了拟议的对自由裁量政策变化的测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号