首页> 外文期刊>Requirements Engineering >Discovering undocumented knowledge through visualization of agile software development activities
【24h】

Discovering undocumented knowledge through visualization of agile software development activities

机译:通过可视化敏捷软件开发活动发现未记录的知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In agile software development projects, software engineers prioritize implementation over documentation. Is the cost of missing documentation greater than the cost of producing unnecessary or unused documentation? Agile software engineers must still maintain other software artifacts, such as tickets in an issue tracking system or source code committed to a version control system (VCS). Do these artifacts contain useful knowledge? In this paper, we examine undocumented knowledge in a multi-case exploratory case study of industrial agile software development projects. The first is an internal project with 159 source code commits and roughly 8000 lines of code. The second is an external project with 760 source code commits and roughly 50,000 lines of code. We introduce a ticket-commit network chart (TCC) that visually represents time-series commit activities along with filed issue tickets. We also implement a tool to generate the TCC using both commit log and ticket data. Our case study revealed that software engineers committed source code to the VCS without a corresponding issue ticket in a non-trivial minority of instances. If these commits were based on and linked to individual issue tickets, then these “unissued” tickets would have accounted for a non-trivial minority (5–21%) of the knowledge needed for future software modification and operations. End users and requirements engineers also evaluated the contents of these commits. They found that the omission of links to individual tickets had an important impact on future software modification or operation with between 22 and 49% of these instances resulting in undocumented knowledge.
机译:在敏捷软件开发项目中,软件工程师优先于文档实施。丢失文档的成本是否大于制作不必要或未使用的文档的成本?敏捷软件工程师仍必须维护其他软件工件,例如问题跟踪系统中的票证或承诺用于版本控制系统(VCS)的源代码。这些文物是否包含有用的知识?在本文中,我们在工业敏捷软件开发项目的多案例探索性案例研究中检查了未记录的知识。第一个是一个内部项目,其中包含159个源代码提交和大约8000行代码。第二个是具有760个源代码提交和大约50,000行代码的外部项目。我们引入了一个票证提交网络图表(TCC),该图表直观地表示了时间序列提交活动以及已提交的票证。我们还实现了使用提交日志和票证数据生成TCC的工具。我们的案例研究表明,在少数情况下,软件工程师将源代码提交给VCS却没有相应的问题单。如果这些提交基于并与各个发行凭单相关联,则这些“未发行”凭单将占将来软件修改和操作所需知识的重要部分(占5-21%)。最终用户和需求工程师还评估了这些提交的内容。他们发现,省略到各个票证的链接对将来的软件修改或操作有重要影响,其中22%到49%的情况导致未记录的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号